2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correct testing of mark independence for marked point patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
82
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If the rank of u 0 is larger than 190, there is a significant departure from the null model with a ¼ 0.05 over the scales of interest (e.g., 1-150 m). Details about the GoF test can be found in Loosmore and Ford (2006), and Grabarnik et al (2011).…”
Section: Aggregation Of Mammal Feces At a Range Of Spatial Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the rank of u 0 is larger than 190, there is a significant departure from the null model with a ¼ 0.05 over the scales of interest (e.g., 1-150 m). Details about the GoF test can be found in Loosmore and Ford (2006), and Grabarnik et al (2011).…”
Section: Aggregation Of Mammal Feces At a Range Of Spatial Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the testing method uses a statistic with dependent values at different ranges, inflated type I errors may occur (Grabarnik (cm) et al 2011). Accordingly, to adjust the testing for multiple scales, thus avoiding the problem of simultaneous inference, a deviation test (Grabarnik et al 2011) may be adopted. Also, besides classical p-value testing, alternative approaches such as model validation techniques (Ling and Mahadevan 2013) may also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the spatial coordinates of individual plants represented by the points, marked point patterns provide information on the properties of each object, like species identity, size, etc. (Grabarnik et al 2011). The method proposed in this paper is thus a generalization of individual-centered analysis (Podani and Czárán 1997), which is in turn the multispecies extension of Ripley's (1981) second-order analysis of point patterns.…”
Section: A Phylogenetic Extension Of Individual-centered Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the simulated patterns was the used to compute the empirical non homogeneous K-function to obtain the envelopes. We used the rank test (Grabarnik et al, 2011) to compute the 95% envelopes to get a better approximation to the true p-value for the test. To fit the models we used the R free software (R Development Core Team, 2010), and the contributed package spatstat (Baddeley and Turner, 2000 and 2005), which can be obtained from the R project website www.r-project.org.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%