2004
DOI: 10.1080/10570310409374811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corps/corpse: The U.S. military and homosexuality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Persons who identify as gay are often targets of harassment and even physical violence solely for claiming to be or being perceived as gay (Kimmel and Mahler 2003; Pascoe 2007). In the United States, same‐sex partnerships are not recognized as a legitimate kind of coupling in a variety of contexts (e.g., national and some state governments, hospitals, families), and institutions like the military (Brouwer 2004; Butler 1997) and the educational system (Gust and Warren 2008; Kirk 2008; MacIntosh 2007; Meyer 2005) require a gay person to vigilantly regulate or remain silent about same‐sex desire. Same‐sex relations are often absent from or disregarded in mundane conversation (Feigenbaum 2007; Foster 2008; Glave 2005), and various religions position gays and the “homosexual lifestyle” as immoral, disgusting, and in need of change (Bennett 2003; Brouwer and Hess 2007; Chávez 2004; Cobb 2006; Moon 2002; Stewart 2005).…”
Section: Premises Of Sexuality Gay Identity and The Closetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persons who identify as gay are often targets of harassment and even physical violence solely for claiming to be or being perceived as gay (Kimmel and Mahler 2003; Pascoe 2007). In the United States, same‐sex partnerships are not recognized as a legitimate kind of coupling in a variety of contexts (e.g., national and some state governments, hospitals, families), and institutions like the military (Brouwer 2004; Butler 1997) and the educational system (Gust and Warren 2008; Kirk 2008; MacIntosh 2007; Meyer 2005) require a gay person to vigilantly regulate or remain silent about same‐sex desire. Same‐sex relations are often absent from or disregarded in mundane conversation (Feigenbaum 2007; Foster 2008; Glave 2005), and various religions position gays and the “homosexual lifestyle” as immoral, disgusting, and in need of change (Bennett 2003; Brouwer and Hess 2007; Chávez 2004; Cobb 2006; Moon 2002; Stewart 2005).…”
Section: Premises Of Sexuality Gay Identity and The Closetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout, we vary our descriptors of the protesters (the WBC, Phelps, and more) to reduce repetition and aid ease of reading. [7] See Brouwer (2004) for an analysis of the figuration of the U.S. military as a heterosexual male body at risk of emasculating penetration and compromised efficacy by gay men. [8] Throughout the essay, we retain bloggers' informal or colloquial expressions, marking errors only in three cases involving one misspelling and two misuses of possessives.…”
Section: [4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found it amusing to combine the factorization of K 6 with Fano planes to give an extremal 6 × 70 matrix showing that the upper bound n 3 (3, 3; 6) 71 is in fact an equality (see Theorem 8). We were somewhat disappointed when it turned out that the 170 blocks of the unique 3-(17, 8,14) design (due to Brouwer [3]) cannot be partitioned into disjoint pairs. This fact and Füredi's aforementioned theorem imply the nonexistence of a 17 × 4760 extremal matrix, and thus the bound n 9 (3, 9; 17) 4761 is not tight.…”
Section: E(h)| * (H)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer search shows that there is only one 3-(17, 8,14) design, the one due to Brouwer [3]: it is generated by the affine group GA17 acting on F 17 with generator blocks B 1 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} and B 2 = {1, 2, 4,8,9,13,15, 16} (the squares). This design is not pairable because the disjointness relation on the blocks has odd components (cycles of length 17).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%