Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Companies: International Experience and Polycriterial Evaluation of Technological Innovations’ Effectiveness

Vagin, Sergei G.; Vasyakin, Bogdan S.; Zakharov, M. N.; Shaker, Irina E.

doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.945109

Front. Energy Res.

2022

DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.945109

|View full text |Cite

Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Companies: International Experience and Polycriterial Evaluation of Technological Innovations’ Effectiveness

Sergei G. Vagin

Bogdan S. Vasyakin

M. N. Zakharov

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Evaluation of green governance of energy projects along the Belt and Road

Chen,

Wan,

Wei

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to enhance the assessment of green governance in energy projects along the Belt and Road, reduce the influence of fuzzy judgment, and construct a grey network analysis model from the perspective of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG).Design/methodology/approachThe ESG concept is used to establish an evaluation indicator system. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the Grey System Theory are applied sequentially to determine the green governance grade of energy projects, exemplified by an evaluation of five projects.FindingsThe Karot hydropower project has the best green governance status among the five projects and is of excellent grade. This is followed by the Hongfeng photovoltaic project, the De Aar wind power project, and the Yamal liquefied natural gas project, which are of good grade. The Lamu coal power station project has the worst green governance and is at a medium level.Practical implicationsThis study can assist Belt and Road energy projects in identifying their deficiencies and promoting sustainable development by providing a robust framework for green governance evaluation.Originality/valueThe indicator system developed in this study includes social and project governance aspects in addition to environmental performance, reflecting the comprehensive green governance status of projects. The combined use of ANP and grey system theory fully considers the mutual influence relationship between indicators and improves the objectivity of green governance grade judgment.

show abstract

Evaluation of green governance of energy projects along the Belt and Road

Chen,

Wan,

Wei

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Companies: International Experience and Polycriterial Evaluation of Technological Innovations’ Effectiveness

Cited by 1 publication

References 33 publications

Evaluation of green governance of energy projects along the Belt and Road

Evaluation of green governance of energy projects along the Belt and Road

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About