Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives

Abstract

Firms engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) because they consider that some kind of competitive advantage accrues to them. We contend that resource-based perspectives (RBP) are useful to understand why firms engage in CSR activities and disclosure. From a resource-based perspective CSR is seen as providing internal or external benefits, or both. Investments in socially responsible activities may have internal benefits by helping a firm to develop new resources and capabilities which are related namely to know-how and corporate culture. In effect, investing in social responsibility activities and disclosure has important consequences on the creation or depletion of fundamental intangible resources, namely those associated with employees. The external benefits of CSR are related to its effect on corporate reputation. Corporate reputation can be understood as a fundamental intangible resource which can be created or depleted as a consequence of the decisions to engage or not in social responsibility activities and disclosure. Firms with good social responsibility reputation may improve relations with external actors. They may also attract better employees or increase current employees’ motivation, morale, commitment and loyalty to the firm. This article contributes to the understanding of why CSR may be seen as having strategic value for firms and how RBP can be used in such endeavour. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006capabilities, corporate reputation, corporate social responsibility, financial performance, resources, resource-based perspectives,

Do Entrepreneurial SMEs Perform Better Because They are More Responsible?

“…The resource-based view (RBV) thus seems a relevant theoretical framework, as value-creating SD practices and strategies depend not only on having unique and heterogeneous resources but also, and more important, on being able to mobilize and combine these resources. This approach emphasizes businesses' resources and internal strategic capabilities that make generating competitive advantages possible (Anderson and Eshima 2013;Castelo Branco and Lima Rodrigues 2006;Hart and Dowell 2011). Tangible resources are linked to practical aspects, while intangible resources refer to immaterial resources and capacities, such as reputation and human capital (Halme and Korpela 2014).…”

Corporate social responsibility in tourism small and medium enterprises evidence from Europe and Latin America

“…The opportunities arising from it have been explained through the Resource-Based View (RBV) theory, which considers that CSR can lead to the generation of resources and capabilities that can provide sustainable competitive advantage to the company (Branco & Rodrigues, 2006). On the other hand, pressures from stakeholders are manifested especially by the need for accountability starting with its customers, who increasingly denounce possible fraudulent greenwashing practices (Ramus & Montiel, 2005), and continues with other stakeholders (Sen & Bhattacharya, 2001).…”

Evaluation of the evolution of green management with a Kuhnian perspective

“…These attempts that address moral and ethical issues among firms and its environment is called corporate social responsibility (CSR), and include a wide range of social issues including environmental protection, relations with stakeholders, worker health, and safety (Branco and Rodriguez 2006;Baron 2010). Thus, CSR approach suggested that financial performance is not only the relevant measure of corporate performance but environmental and social performances must also be considered (Baron 2010).…”