Corporate Digital Responsibility

Mihale-Wilson, Cristina; Hinz, Oliver; Aalst, Wil van der; Weinhardt, Christof

doi:10.1007/s12599-022-00746-y

Cited by 37 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While these are issues I will also highlight as key debates and future research opportunities below, this line of thinking seems critical to our understanding of whether CDR can be an emancipated research topic of interest for the BISE community (Mihale-Wilson et al 2022). In the literature, a two-fold approach emancipating CDR from CSR can be found.…”

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The discourses on, for instance, digital business strategy (e.g., Bharadwaj et al 2013) or digital transformation (e.g., Wessel et al 2021) employ a similar strategy. Recently, Mihale-Wilson et al (2022) continue this thinking and add aspects like agency, recombinant capabilities, pervasiveness, and opacity.…”

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other side, literature also suggests that the moral regulation of digital technologies is a pressing and contemporary issue, thus justifying the at least temporary highlighting of the topic (Mihale-Wilson et al 2022). Doerr (2021) complements these thoughts by compiling a list of contemporary business trends that demonstrate the salience of digital topics and explains how this salience expands traditional corporate responsibility regimes.…”

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Doerr (2021) complements these thoughts by compiling a list of contemporary business trends that demonstrate the salience of digital topics and explains how this salience expands traditional corporate responsibility regimes. In conclusion, Mihale-Wilson et al (2022) establish ''that a distinction between CDR and CSR is necessary because technology reshapes and extends the traditional corporate responsibilities unprecedentedly'' (p. 128); arguments which align well with Moor (1985).…”

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While such policies should be considered as part of an organization's larger corporate responsibility, recent literature (e.g., Herden et al 2021;Lobschat et al 2021) has begun to propose the concept of corporate digital responsibility (CDR). Also, the Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE) community has set its sights on the concept and the research opportunities connected to it (e.g., Mihale-Wilson et al 2022). This is evidenced by the attention dedicated to digital forms of corporate responsibility through, for instance, conferences (e.g., WI'23 1 ) and special issues.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Corporate Digital Responsibility

Mueller

2022

Bus Inf Syst Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Corporate Digital Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Corporate Digital Responsibility

Mueller

2022

Bus Inf Syst Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unraveling the influence of human capital and stakeholder engagement on corporate digital responsibility: Implications for firm performance in Southeast Asia enterprises

Vo Thai,

Hue,

Chen

et al. 2023

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Southeast Asian enterprises (SAEs) face the challenge of ensuring responsible and ethical utilization of data and digital technologies in the rapidly evolving digital landscape. Corporate digital responsibility (CDR) has emerged as a framework to guide organizations in adopting socially, economically, technologically, and ecologically responsible practices. However, empirical research on CDR is limited, highlighting the need for further investigation to bridge the gap between theory and practice. This study addresses this gap by examining the influence of human capital and stakeholder engagement on the formulation and execution of CDR strategies and their impact on firm performance. Drawing upon the theoretical framework of a Resource‐Based View and analyzing data from 2106 enterprises in Vietnam, Philippines, and Indonesia were collected through the Future of Business Survey. This research contributes insights into the drivers and determinants of CDR adoption and implementation, evaluates the effectiveness of different CDR approaches in achieving favorable post‐CDR performance outcomes, emphasizes the moderating role of stakeholder engagement, and offers a unique empirical perspective within the context of SAEs. This study enriches our understanding of CDR and provides practical implications for organizations seeking to navigate the complexities of responsible digital practices.

show abstract

How can corporate digital responsibility (CDR) be measured in line with corporate social responsibility (CSR)? A new theoretical approach in construction 4.0

Weber‐Lewerenz,

Traverso

2024

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Corporate responsibility in Civil Engineering in the digital era is changing rapidly. An attempt is made to make CDR more “tangible” by assigning and defining entrepreneurial approaches. This paper investigates the relationship between CSR and CDR based on a structured literature analysis, Internet research and Hermeneutic approach. The study examines the status quo of existing methods for measuring CDR and proposes a practicable framework for measuring successfully practiced CDR. The paper investigates the value‐based use of digitization and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as crucial factors to derive new ways to shape and catalyze the industry's assumption of human, social and environmental responsibility. The study defines a new approach to a corporate strategy in order to make the fulfillment of CSR measurable and assessable with regard to the effects of digital technological innovations on human, society and environment, taking into account current Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) regulations and guidelines.

show abstract

Corporate Digital Responsibility

Cited by 37 publications

References 14 publications

Corporate Digital Responsibility

Corporate Digital Responsibility

Unraveling the influence of human capital and stakeholder engagement on corporate digital responsibility: Implications for firm performance in Southeast Asia enterprises

How can corporate digital responsibility (CDR) be measured in line with corporate social responsibility (CSR)? A new theoretical approach in construction 4.0

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About