Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The concept of corporate criminal liability, which has been around for quite some time, has been the focus of in-depth and heated debate in recent years, particularly with regard to its evolution and the effectiveness of its application. In spite of this, the most fundamental question of corporate criminal liability, which is, specifically, the role it serves in relation to other liability regimes, continues to be unresolved. The existing legal frameworks for imposing criminal liability on corporations suffer from a lack of clarity regarding the standards for imposing liability and the repercussions for corporations. This lack of clarity results in inconsistent application of the law and reduces the efficacy of corporate criminal liability as a tool for discouraging wrongdoing by corporations. This problem is made considerably worse by the fact that many corporate crimes are complicated and involve many countries. As a result, it is difficult to set exact rules for determining liability and to assure uniform enforcement across several different jurisdictions.
The concept of corporate criminal liability, which has been around for quite some time, has been the focus of in-depth and heated debate in recent years, particularly with regard to its evolution and the effectiveness of its application. In spite of this, the most fundamental question of corporate criminal liability, which is, specifically, the role it serves in relation to other liability regimes, continues to be unresolved. The existing legal frameworks for imposing criminal liability on corporations suffer from a lack of clarity regarding the standards for imposing liability and the repercussions for corporations. This lack of clarity results in inconsistent application of the law and reduces the efficacy of corporate criminal liability as a tool for discouraging wrongdoing by corporations. This problem is made considerably worse by the fact that many corporate crimes are complicated and involve many countries. As a result, it is difficult to set exact rules for determining liability and to assure uniform enforcement across several different jurisdictions.
The path that the Latvian normative regulation in criminal law and the Latvian criminal law doctrine took to arrive at the possibility of turning against legal entities by criminal law measures was neither fast nor simple. The initial position was that regulation like this would be incompatible with the basic principles of Latvian criminal law since, historically, psychological understanding of guilt has been characteristic in the Latvian criminal law, guilt is identified with a person's mental attitude towards the criminal offence, and guilt also is one of the grounds for criminal liability. It was not clear how this understanding of guilt could be compatible with punishing such "legal fiction" as a legal person in the framework of criminal law. Ways, in which Latvia could adjust its legal regulation to various international normative documents that Latvia had acceded to, at the same time leaving the dominant basic institutions of the Latvian criminal law theory unaffected, were sought rather reluctantly. Discussions that lasted for years resulted in the inclusion into the Criminal Law coercive measures, existing outside the system of criminal penalties, applicable to legal persons, likewise, several criteria were defined as the grounds for applying these coercive measures to legal persons, the central of which was a criminal offence, committed by a natural person who was connected to the legal person, in the interests of the legal person or as the result of insufficient control by this legal person. Accordingly, criminal procedural regulation was created, which to a large extent equalled a legal person to an accused natural person in criminal proceedings. Although the criminal law and criminal law regulation, which provides for the possibility to apply criminal law coercive measures to legal persons in the framework of criminal proceedings has existed in Latvia for already 16 years, these criminal law instruments have started taking their place in the practice of applying law only in recent years, simultaneously also revealing deficiencies in the legal regulation, already now providing sufficient material for analysis to be used for improving these legal norms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.