2000
DOI: 10.1086/209648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Call Policy for Nonconvertible Bonds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we find that the call notice period does not seem to impact on the timing of the call. These two findings confirm earlier results obtained by King and Mauer (2000). By contrast with them, we do find, however, that the presence of restrictive covenants deters firms from calling the bond late.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, we find that the call notice period does not seem to impact on the timing of the call. These two findings confirm earlier results obtained by King and Mauer (2000). By contrast with them, we do find, however, that the presence of restrictive covenants deters firms from calling the bond late.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We finally compute a 120 × 109 array of average risk premiums for every issuer and every month. 11 In their empirical study of corporate bond call policies, King and Mauer (2000) also observe more late calls than early calls.…”
Section: Evidence For Prepayment Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Ingersoll (1977b), Asquith (1995) showed that most callable convertible debt is redeemed by corporations in a timely fashion. Conversely, King and Mauer (2000) found that 86 percent of their sample of callable nonconvertible bonds were called well after the bond's market price exceeded its call price. Again, focusing on convertible debentures, Constantinides (1984), Emanuel (1983), and Constantinides and Rosenthal (1984) analyzed optimal conversion strategies for owners of convertible bonds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using somewhat different techniques, Jordan, Jordan, and Jorgensen (1995) estimated that only about 7% of treasury bonds implied negative call option values, after adjusting for bidask spreads. In the corporate bond sector, King and Mauer (2000) found that the vast majority of issuers delay their calls by an average of 27 months from the date when the call option is first exercisable. Evidence is mixed on the extent to which the call feature is priced into the initial offering yields, though King (2002) reports a "general practice of setting the coupon rate on a callable issue 20-70 basis points higher than a similar noncallable issue".…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%