2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary disease risk assessment in men: Comparison between ASCVD Risk versus Framingham

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ASCVD risk indicated a higher proportion of subjects eligible for statin than another method [3]. It was found in the study that high proportion of subjects needed for statin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ASCVD risk indicated a higher proportion of subjects eligible for statin than another method [3]. It was found in the study that high proportion of subjects needed for statin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The ASCVD risk of the PCE could not comprehensively include all subjects from FRS method. The ASCVD risk method was limited for the subjects with 40-79 years, total-C of 130-320 mg/dl, and HDL-C of 20-100 mg/dl [3,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third Framingham 30- year risk score is based on BMI and full cardiovascular disease, including hard CVD or other events, such as coronary insufficiency, angina pectoris, and transient ischemic attack (FS30 BMI Full CVD). The fourth FS30 is based on the lipid profile of full cardiovascular disease (FS30 Lipid Full CVD) 4. The fifth score was lifetime atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk (lifetime ASCVD), which was created by ACC/AHA6 by using a white population or other race for the calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10-year and 30-year Framingham risk scoring system (FS) are the most common used scores and were designed using 2 models; one based on blood lipid panel (FS30 Lipid) and the other based on body mass index (FS30 BMI). The major cardiovascular risk factors in the FS are based on the following variables: age, gender, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment, diabetes, abnormal total and High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and body mass index 4. The 30-year Framingham risk score (FS30) reclassified a larger number of subclinical patients and young individuals because it discriminated between those with or without evidence of carotid plaque.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%