2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CORonary Diet Intervention with Olive oil and cardiovascular PREVention study (the CORDIOPREV study): Rationale, methods, and baseline characteristics

Abstract: Coronary heart disease (CHD) represents a major global health burden. However, despite the well-known influence that dietary habits exert over the progression of this disease, there are no well-established and scientifically sound dietary approaches to prevent the onset of clinical outcomes in secondary prevention. The objective of the CORonary Diet Intervention with Olive oil and cardiovascular PREVention study (CORDIOPREV study, clinical trials number NCT00924937) is to compare the ability of a Mediterranean… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
84
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The current work was conducted in a subgroup of 106 male patients within the CORDIOPREV study (Clinical Trials.gov.Identifier: NCT00924937), an ongoing prospective, randomized, opened, controlled trial in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), who had their last coronary event over six months before enrolling in two different dietary models (Mediterranean and low‐fat) over a period of 5 years, in addition to conventional treatment for CHD . CORDIOPREV inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized as follows: patients were eligible if they were over 20 years old, but under 75, had established CHD without clinical events in the last 6 months, were thought to follow a long‐term dietary intervention and did not have severe diseases or an estimated life expectancy of less than 7 years . Usage of antibiotics was included as an exclusion criteria for the current study, in addition to the general exclusion criteria defined in the CORDIOPREV study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current work was conducted in a subgroup of 106 male patients within the CORDIOPREV study (Clinical Trials.gov.Identifier: NCT00924937), an ongoing prospective, randomized, opened, controlled trial in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), who had their last coronary event over six months before enrolling in two different dietary models (Mediterranean and low‐fat) over a period of 5 years, in addition to conventional treatment for CHD . CORDIOPREV inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized as follows: patients were eligible if they were over 20 years old, but under 75, had established CHD without clinical events in the last 6 months, were thought to follow a long‐term dietary intervention and did not have severe diseases or an estimated life expectancy of less than 7 years . Usage of antibiotics was included as an exclusion criteria for the current study, in addition to the general exclusion criteria defined in the CORDIOPREV study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The trial was designed and conducted by the authors, and the protocol and all amendments were approved by the local ethics committees, all of which follow the Helsinki Declaration and good clinical practices. 14 The trial was designed and conducted by the authors, and the protocol and all amendments were approved by the local ethics committees, all of which follow the Helsinki Declaration and good clinical practices.…”
Section: Overall Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the CORDIOPREV study have been provided in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00924937) and in a recent publication. 14 The trial was designed and conducted by the authors, and the protocol and all amendments were approved by the local ethics committees, all of which follow the Helsinki Declaration and good clinical practices.…”
Section: Overall Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design has been previously described . Briefly, participants were randomized to receive two diets: a Med diet or a low‐fat diet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%