2020
DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020200281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: New Insights into Clinical Interpretation—Lessons from the CAC Consortium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the CAC Consortium study, in 6375 patients with “SPRINT-like” characteristics (age > 50 years and Framingham risk score > 15%), it was shown that CAC stratifies hypertension and recategorizes the 10-year risk probability of cardiovascular events [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CAC Consortium study, in 6375 patients with “SPRINT-like” characteristics (age > 50 years and Framingham risk score > 15%), it was shown that CAC stratifies hypertension and recategorizes the 10-year risk probability of cardiovascular events [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores of 0, 1 to 100, 101 to 400, greater than 400 represented as stage normal, mild, moderate, and severe CAD risk. This re-classification could provide a reliable predictor for long-term all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality [ 18 ]. Even though the cost and radiation exposure of cardiac MDCT are concerns, CAC still has the ability to detect asymptomatic atherosclerosis at an early stage [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Finally, the coronary calcium Consortium has assembled a database of 66,636 asymptomatic adult participants free cardiovascular disease at baseline. 14 It is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study, designed to study the association between coronary calcium and long-term, cause-specific mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%