2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract: In this single-center observational study among patients with ULMD, CABG was associated with improved long-term outcomes, especially in patients with more complex disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
39
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
39
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these guidelines were mainly based on midterm findings of the SYNTAX trial [ 6 ], the PRECOMBAT trial [ 7 ], and two other small trials [ 8 , 9 ], all of which were underpowered to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of PCI versus CABG, particularly for individual hard endpoints. In the last 3 years, long-term follow-up data of the PRECOMBAT and SYNTAX trials [ 10 , 11 ], the large-scale EXCEL (Evaluation of Xience Everolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization; NCT01205776), the NOBLE (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis; NCT01496651) trials [ 12 , 13 ], and several large-scale adjusted registries [ 14 16 ] were published. Notably, the EXCEL and NOBLE trials may be the last clinical trials randomizing patients with left main CAD to PCI or CABG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these guidelines were mainly based on midterm findings of the SYNTAX trial [ 6 ], the PRECOMBAT trial [ 7 ], and two other small trials [ 8 , 9 ], all of which were underpowered to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of PCI versus CABG, particularly for individual hard endpoints. In the last 3 years, long-term follow-up data of the PRECOMBAT and SYNTAX trials [ 10 , 11 ], the large-scale EXCEL (Evaluation of Xience Everolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization; NCT01205776), the NOBLE (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Drug Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis; NCT01496651) trials [ 12 , 13 ], and several large-scale adjusted registries [ 14 16 ] were published. Notably, the EXCEL and NOBLE trials may be the last clinical trials randomizing patients with left main CAD to PCI or CABG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the DELTA-2 study, the largest registry of LMCA PCI with second-generation DES (n = 3986), Kaplan-Meier estimates of events at 2 years were 9.5% and 16.7% for death or target vessel revascularization, respectively. 6 Hazard ratios for PCI vs. CABG with respect to the composite of death, stroke, or MI were 1.06 and 0.91 in the two registries with 3-year follow-up available, 25,26 the comparable rates with the two revascularization options thus being consistent with the conclusions from the EXCEL trial.…”
Section: Meta-analyses Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Vs Medimentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The Fu-Wai, IRIS-MAIN and DELTA-2 registries cover a treatment period that goes from 2004 to 2015. 6,25,26 Compared with PCI patients enrolled in the EXCEL trial, the mean SYNTAX score in these registries tended to be higher but still fell in the low to intermediate risk category (Table 2). In the DELTA-2 study, the largest registry of LMCA PCI with second-generation DES (n = 3986), Kaplan-Meier estimates of events at 2 years were 9.5% and 16.7% for death or target vessel revascularization, respectively.…”
Section: Meta-analyses Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Vs Medimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В этой когорте более чем у половины пациентов встречается поражение ствола левой коронарной артерии (СтЛКА), сахарный диабет (СД) и другие факторы, которые создают предпосылки к тому, что для значительной доли пациентов коронарное шунтирование (КШ) может быть оптимальной опцией реваскуляризации [2][3][4]. Большинство исследований показывают, что женский пол и ряд сопутствующих состояний, таких как СД, мультифокальный атеросклероз (МФА) и хроническая почечная недостаточность (ХПН) увеличивают частоту осложнений при ОКС↓ST [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Приоритетной стратегией реваскуляризации для пациентов с ОКС является ЧКВ, которое выполняется в клинической практике большинству пациентов с ОКС↓ST, имеющим МП коронарных артерий. Результаты рандомизированных исследований показали безопасность и эффективность ЧКВ при правильном выборе пациентов для процедуры: с низким и средним ангиографическим риском [7]. Использование внутрисосудистого ультразвукового исследования и оценка фракционного резерва кровотока позволяет не только оценить значимость поражения коронарного русла, когда необходимо доказать гемодинамическую значимость стеноза, но и достичь оптимальной аппозиции стента, что снижает риск тромбоза стента и рестенозов в будущем [8].…”
unclassified