2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1300-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronal and sagittal spinal alignment in lumbar disc herniation with scoliosis and trunk shift

Abstract: Background To investigate the incidence of scoliosis and trunk shift in patients with LDH (lumbar disc herniation) and analyze the differences in spinopelvic alignment among patients with or without trunk shift and non-symptom controls. Materials and methods All included subjects had standard upright antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of the whole spine taken. Evidence of disc herniation was confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The param… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e results suggested that the FA of L3 and L4 lumbar nerve roots in the subjects of group A were not statistically extreme compared with that of group B (P > 0.05), which was similar to the research results of Wang et al [17], indicating that patients with L5 nerve root pain caused by LDH had no lesion changes in L3 and L4 lumbar nerve roots, which were not different from healthy volunteers. e FA of L5 and S1 lumbar nerve roots was lower steeply in the subjects of group A than that of group B, and the difference has statistical significance (P < 0.05), which was different from the results of Wu et al [18]. It might be associated with histopathological changes in nerve roots generated from the nerve root compressed by herniated disc, and DTI images presented the disorder and narrow of nerve fibers and the decline of FA.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…e results suggested that the FA of L3 and L4 lumbar nerve roots in the subjects of group A were not statistically extreme compared with that of group B (P > 0.05), which was similar to the research results of Wang et al [17], indicating that patients with L5 nerve root pain caused by LDH had no lesion changes in L3 and L4 lumbar nerve roots, which were not different from healthy volunteers. e FA of L5 and S1 lumbar nerve roots was lower steeply in the subjects of group A than that of group B, and the difference has statistical significance (P < 0.05), which was different from the results of Wu et al [18]. It might be associated with histopathological changes in nerve roots generated from the nerve root compressed by herniated disc, and DTI images presented the disorder and narrow of nerve fibers and the decline of FA.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Parameters of spinal kyphosis (TK), the C7 plumb line (PL), and the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) from C7 PL were associated with the biomechanical characteristics of discs. 51 Regrettably, it was difficult to perform further research using these data because of the lack of related preoperative examination. This lack of data is an inherent limitation of retrospective studies.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes of lumbosacral parameters could also be observed in LDH patients and compensatory mechanisms of spinal sagittal imbalance mainly include more forward translation of SVA, LL loss, TK and PT increase. 2,8,16,17,19,20 In the current study, the magnitude of spinal imbalance was different among the three subgroups. The magnitude of sagittal and coronal imbalance in Group C was significantly more severe than that of Group A and Group B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Because L4-5 was not confined to the pelvic cavity, it may be more vulnerable to trunk list compared with L5-S1. As for whether the gender is the risk factor for the trunk shift in LDH, sciatic scoliosis was more frequently observed in men 2,7 than in women 17 in previous reports. In our study, the gender and affected level were not found to be related to spinal imbalance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation