2020
DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.919822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal Ulcer Treated with 0.66% Nanoemulsion Povidone-Iodine: A Case Report

Abstract: Unusual clinical course Background: Corneal ulceration is caused by various corneal diseases, including infection, inflammatory disease, neurotrophic keratitis, dry-eye, autoimmune disease, and blepharitis. Treatment should be based on the etiology. In cases of infection, corneal scraping and pathogen culture should be carried out before treatment. Bacterial pathogens are the most common etiology, but it can be caused also by viruses, fungi, and protozoa. Quinolones are the first-line drug for bacterial kerati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the recent increased interest in low dosage Povidone-Iodine as a broad spectrum, low-cost, resistant-free antimicrobic agent [28], there is still limited strong evidence of its in vivo effectiveness in cases of IK [14,15,[29][30][31], however, it suggests positive clinical outcomes. Herein, we present the first study to evaluate the role of 0.66% PVP-I during the time-to-results period of IK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the recent increased interest in low dosage Povidone-Iodine as a broad spectrum, low-cost, resistant-free antimicrobic agent [28], there is still limited strong evidence of its in vivo effectiveness in cases of IK [14,15,[29][30][31], however, it suggests positive clinical outcomes. Herein, we present the first study to evaluate the role of 0.66% PVP-I during the time-to-results period of IK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At concentrations between 5% and 10%, it is the elective infection-prophylactic agent in ocular surgery [11]. Nonetheless, new formulations at lower concentrations (i.e., 0.05-1.5%) have been shown to be even more effective in the treatment of ocular surface infections [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different antimicrobial agents, formulations containing PVP-I have been used for antisepsis for a long time. Particularly, 0.66% PVP-I has been described in cases of corneal ulcers [44, 45] as well as in adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis [46] treated successfully. It also has several advantages when compared to other antiseptics: it has the broadest spectrum of activity, it is effective in killing ESKAPE pathogens and biofilms, and there has been no resistance or cross-resistance described even if it has been widely used for decades [18].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, two recent case reports demonstrated the effectiveness of 0.66% PVI in the resolution of signs and symptoms of a corneal ulcer, following treatment failure based on antibiotics [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%