2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core-sheath 3D printing of highly conductive and MoS2-loaded electrode with pseudocapacitive behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For symmetrical EDLC device performance, this translates to impressive areal and volumetric energy densities of 1.12/ 7.01 mWh cm À 2 and 1.24/7.79 mWh cm À 3 at 2 mA cm À 2 in aqueous/organic electrolyte, respectively. Notably, the best values for areal and volumetric energy densities realized in the organic solvent are significantly higher than all the Angewandte Chemie reported 3D printed supercapacitors, including EDLC [17,19,51,52,58] and pseudocapacitive [4,18,23,24,53,54] ones, and even rival thick aerogel supercapacitors [57,59] (Figure 5f). The specific data are listed in Table S2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For symmetrical EDLC device performance, this translates to impressive areal and volumetric energy densities of 1.12/ 7.01 mWh cm À 2 and 1.24/7.79 mWh cm À 3 at 2 mA cm À 2 in aqueous/organic electrolyte, respectively. Notably, the best values for areal and volumetric energy densities realized in the organic solvent are significantly higher than all the Angewandte Chemie reported 3D printed supercapacitors, including EDLC [17,19,51,52,58] and pseudocapacitive [4,18,23,24,53,54] ones, and even rival thick aerogel supercapacitors [57,59] (Figure 5f). The specific data are listed in Table S2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For symmetrical EDLC device performance, this translates to impressive areal and volumetric energy densities of 1.12/ 7.01 mWh cm À 2 and 1.24/7.79 mWh cm À 3 at 2 mA cm À 2 in aqueous/organic electrolyte, respectively. Notably, the best values for areal and volumetric energy densities realized in the organic solvent are significantly higher than all the Angewandte Chemie Forschungsartikel reported 3D printed supercapacitors, including EDLC [17,19,51,52,58] and pseudocapacitive [4,18,23,24,53,54] ones, and even rival thick aerogel supercapacitors [57,59] (Figure 5f). The specific data are listed in Table S2.…”
Section: Forschungsartikelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Besides, different from other puffy 3D electrodes, the packing density of the densified 3D printed electrode also stands up to an impressive level of 322.2 mg cm À 3 , which is 5-20 times higher than traditional 3D printed electrodes. [17,19,24,[51][52][53][54] Notably, the printed electrodes at such high loading and packing densities (hundreds of mg cm À 2 and mg cm À 3 ) deliver almost constant gravimetric and volumetric specific capacitances at a fixed current density (e.g., 113.2 F g À 1 and 36.4 F cm À 3 for the 16-layer electrode at the current density of 2 mA cm À 2 ) (Figure 4b), indicating an efficient utilization of the active materials. Both the lineally increased discharge time and integral area of cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves against printed layer numbers confirm the above conclusion (Figure S5).…”
Section: Forschungsartikelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,20 In SF-FS systems, the structural fibers are usually composed of polymers while the functional sheaths are inorganic nanomaterials. 6,15,21,22 In comparison, the sheath in a SHF-FC is polymer based and the inner core is composed of functional components. 19,23−29 Nevertheless, both systems are only sensitive to quasi-static forces, such as stretching, bending, and twisting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%