2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63533-4.00004-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core Sample Preparation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After segmentation, the connected pores were transformed into cylindrical pore throats and spherical pore bodies using the skeletonization tool, resulting in a series of nodal points, segments, and nodes that served as input to calculate porosity and permeability of the sample using PoreFlow software (Raoof et al 2013). Considering routine core analysis as a calibration technique (McPhee et al 2015), PoreFlow results showed a good agreement with the measurements (provides shown in Table 4). While the porosities obtained with PoreFlow were smaller, the calculated and measured permeabilities were similar for most samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After segmentation, the connected pores were transformed into cylindrical pore throats and spherical pore bodies using the skeletonization tool, resulting in a series of nodal points, segments, and nodes that served as input to calculate porosity and permeability of the sample using PoreFlow software (Raoof et al 2013). Considering routine core analysis as a calibration technique (McPhee et al 2015), PoreFlow results showed a good agreement with the measurements (provides shown in Table 4). While the porosities obtained with PoreFlow were smaller, the calculated and measured permeabilities were similar for most samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Routine core analysis is a non-destructive technique used to determine the porosity and permeability as based on Boyle's law and Darcy's law, respectively. Results obtained with a combined gas permeameter-porosimeter (AP-608, from Coretest Systems Inc., Reno, NV) provided a reference for all other petrophysical measurements (McPhee et al 2015). For the NMR measurements, we saturated the samples in a saline solution consisting of 30,000 ppm KCl brine with a density of 1.0167 g/cm 3 and subjected to a hydrostatic pressure of 138 bar for 24 h (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, clay minerals (e.g., kaolinite and illite) detached from the shale surface tend to block parts of pore throat restrictions. 54 Accordingly, the rate of decrease in the contact angle was lowered in the second stage to some extent.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With increasing time, the infiltration of water droplets becomes the main reason why the contact angles are observed to still decrease, although the water droplets stop spreading over the shale surface. Meanwhile, clay minerals (e.g., kaolinite and illite) detached from the shale surface tend to block parts of pore throat restrictions . Accordingly, the rate of decrease in the contact angle was lowered in the second stage to some extent.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smectite clays such as natural-Veegum (VF) and synthetic-laponite (LP) are also widely used in the pharmaceuticals as stabilising and suspending agent, rheology modifier as well as texture enhancer (15,16). Primarily, these high swelling clays contain Na + ions in between their interlayer spacing, enabling them to adsorb up to 32 layers of water molecules (17). Adebisi et al found that VF increases the dissolution rate of theophylline from the tablet matrices (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%