2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coracoid bone graft resorption after Latarjet procedure is underestimated: a new classification system and a clinical review with computed tomography evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
90
2
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
90
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…39 Late coracoid graft resorption after Latarjet procedures is also increasingly recognized. Zhu et al 40 reported that some degree of coracoid graft resorption occurs after greater than 90% of Latarjet procedures; however, the clinical significance of this finding remains unclear because graft resorption did not correlate with functional outcomes or recurrent instability. In addition, long-term outcome studies have reported significant rates of glenohumeral arthropathy after Latarjet procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Late coracoid graft resorption after Latarjet procedures is also increasingly recognized. Zhu et al 40 reported that some degree of coracoid graft resorption occurs after greater than 90% of Latarjet procedures; however, the clinical significance of this finding remains unclear because graft resorption did not correlate with functional outcomes or recurrent instability. In addition, long-term outcome studies have reported significant rates of glenohumeral arthropathy after Latarjet procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O principal desfecho estudado foi a osteólise do enxerto coracoide, classificado em quatro tipos segundo Zhu et al 16 (►Tabela 1). De acordo com essa classificação, os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos, A (sem reabsorcão ou menor) e B (reabsorção maior ou total).…”
Section: População Do Estudounclassified
“…[34][35][36] Although clinical risk of true neurologic injury remains low, screw fixation of bone graft also carries the risk of graft osteolysis, cut out, and symptomatic harware. 16,17,19,23,26 Suspensory fixation has been described previously in the literature through an open technique as an alternative to screw fixation of with a similar biomechanical strength. 16,31 Recently, Kalogrianitis et al 33 described an arthroscopic technique of iliac crest autograft bone augmentation with suspensory suture button fixation.…”
Section: E100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 In addition, because bone osteolysis has been described, especially around the superior screw, painful hardware can result. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] These open techniques are not without complication, and more recent arthroscopic techniques to augment bone loss have been described. 21,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Despite the advent of these techniques, difficulty with fixation arthroscopically remains a concern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%