2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles affect yield, nutritional quality, and auxin associated gene expression in weedy and cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, our data show that the effects of core–shell nanostructures on plant development (e.g., photosynthesis, element content, and fresh biomass) are plant species specific. This is in agreement with a plethora of studies published that show plant specificity in terms of agrichemical type and dose. It is worth noting that in this proof of concept field study, we selected two important commodity crops as model plants, soybean (dicot) and wheat (monocot) and no effort was made to design plant specific model nanostructures and/or select plant specific agrichemical(s) and dose to optimize grain yield. One of the possible reasons for the different behavior of soybean and wheat is that soybean can benefit from Rhizobium and fix N in the root-based nodules .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As expected, our data show that the effects of core–shell nanostructures on plant development (e.g., photosynthesis, element content, and fresh biomass) are plant species specific. This is in agreement with a plethora of studies published that show plant specificity in terms of agrichemical type and dose. It is worth noting that in this proof of concept field study, we selected two important commodity crops as model plants, soybean (dicot) and wheat (monocot) and no effort was made to design plant specific model nanostructures and/or select plant specific agrichemical(s) and dose to optimize grain yield. One of the possible reasons for the different behavior of soybean and wheat is that soybean can benefit from Rhizobium and fix N in the root-based nodules .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This indicated that, at the tested concentrations, ZnO and CuO NPs application promoted the biomass production of Medicago polymorpha L., and the concentration tested were not toxic for biomass production of Medicago polymorpha L. compared with Zn 2+ and Cu 2+ . Previous studies demonstrated that the toxicological effects of metal oxide NPs were dependent on the metal oxide particle size and treatment concentrations ( Deng et al, 2020 ; Deng et al, 2022 ). For example, Deng et al (2020) reported that CuO NPs (75–600 mg kg −1 ) caused more physiological impairments compared with bulk CuO and Cu 2+ in bok choy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, exposure to 50 and 500 mg kg −1 CuO NPs resulted in 36.2 and 21.1% decreases in the total amino acid content, respectively ( Rui et al, 2018 ). Deng et al (2022) reported that CuO NPs at 75 mg kg −1 significantly decreased the grain yield of cultivated rice by 38.3%, and CuO NPs at ≥300 mg kg −1 caused no grain production of rice. More alarmingly, Zn and Cu released by ZnO and CuO NPs may be enriched in the edible part of crops, which may threaten human health through their consumption ( Rajput et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been established that Cu-based NPs have the ability to alter element accumulation in plants. Foliar application of NPs in the form of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers has been increasingly employed in agriculture. Leaves and roots vary in physiological function; therefore, absorption of NPs differs between these organs.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%