2007
DOI: 10.1557/proc-1012-y03-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper-Indium-Boron-Diselenide Absorber Materials

Abstract: Attempts to fabricate new CuIn 1-x B x Se 2 (CIBS) and CuBSe 2 (CBS) thin-film materials have been complicated by the formation of interfering crystallites and by the loss of boron from the magnetron sputtered precursor alloys during the selenization and annealing processes. Raman and Auger spectroscopic analysis as well as X-ray diffraction studies show that the formation of boron selenide may be contributing to the difficulty in creating these new materials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been found that there are few experimental studies of alloys, especially related to CuInBSe 2 , in the literature. [21][22][23] On the other hand, the structural lattice parameters and electronic band gap energies of CuBX 2 chalcopyrite materials have been calculated theoretically using informatics-based approaches. 11,24 The electronic structures of CuBS 2 and CuBSe 2 have also been presented in terms of the density functional theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been found that there are few experimental studies of alloys, especially related to CuInBSe 2 , in the literature. [21][22][23] On the other hand, the structural lattice parameters and electronic band gap energies of CuBX 2 chalcopyrite materials have been calculated theoretically using informatics-based approaches. 11,24 The electronic structures of CuBS 2 and CuBSe 2 have also been presented in terms of the density functional theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a trail off at lower energy, the straight line portion of the curve is quite evident and yields a bandgap of 3.03 eV. This result is encouraging since the predicted bandgap for CuBSe2 was 3.17 eV [6]. However, the Raman spectrum for this film was less encouraging.…”
Section: In-situ Selenization Depositionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Although no CulnxB1-xSe2 (CIBS) films have been reported, a simple approach was used to estimate that the amount of B substitution needed to reach a bandgap of 1.37 eV. This calculation showed that less than 19% B is needed [6). The copper, indium and boron materials in the films were deposited simultaneously and sequentially in respective methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) using boron and an estimate of the bandgap of CuBSe 2 [6] yields a substitution level for B for In of only 18.6% to yield a bandgap of 1.37 eV. Unfortunately, at this time boron has not been fully introduced into the CIS structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%