2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copolymer crystallization: Approaching equilibrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the two‐phase model may underestimate the lamellar thickness because of the possible existence of the transition layer, this value is still very small as compared with the typical lamellar thickness for i‐PP homopolymer (∼100 Å). Some recent studies for random ethylene‐based copolymer system7, 9–11, 29 reported the existence of thin lamellar structure because of the lower melting temperature, which is consistent with our findings. These results are different from Flory's model,30 which prohibits chain folding in random copolymer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the two‐phase model may underestimate the lamellar thickness because of the possible existence of the transition layer, this value is still very small as compared with the typical lamellar thickness for i‐PP homopolymer (∼100 Å). Some recent studies for random ethylene‐based copolymer system7, 9–11, 29 reported the existence of thin lamellar structure because of the lower melting temperature, which is consistent with our findings. These results are different from Flory's model,30 which prohibits chain folding in random copolymer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Second, the sequence length of the crystallizable component in random copolymer also decreases, which would lead to shorter lamellar thickness. As a result, crystalline in random copolymers always shows a lower melting temperature and broader enthalpy change in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurement as compared with those of homopolymers 7, 9–11. These features make the properties of crystallizable random copolymers very different from homopolymers, and thus provide considerable commercial potential 12, 13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The alternative, and currently more standard, interpretation is that broad and multimodal melting endotherms observed for polyethylene copolymers with narrow copolymer composition distribution (CCD) are due to the intrachain sequence length distribution, and this explanation has continued to be invoked in recent publications. [18][19][20][21][22] This approach is based on the equilibrium theory of Flory 23 and the classical G-T theory. Using this approach, it has been argued that a thicker crystal population arises in a primary crystallization step, during isothermal, bulk crystallization, from the longer ethylene sequences, which create a network structure that constrains shorter sequences to crystallize in a secondary step to form a thinner crystal population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted crystallinity difference (with respect to f c ¼ 1) may be attributed to the topology and the eventual kinetic restraint with reference to Flory's equilibrium theory. 16,[61][62][63][64] Therefore, crystallinity may be improved by decreasing the kinetic and topological restraints. By topology, we mean the crystallizable isotactic polypropylene sequence length distribution SLD (due to stereodefects), the density of chain entanglement, and the conguration of the folding lamellae.…”
Section: Melting Behavior and Crystallization Of I-pp: Flory's Equilimentioning
confidence: 99%