1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7373(05)80086-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with the complexities of multiple-solution problems: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 Workload has been shown to contribute to decision making and errors in other studies in the medical field. 6 Fatigue is a major factor in performance decrements and cognitive decline.…”
Section: Variables Selectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Workload has been shown to contribute to decision making and errors in other studies in the medical field. 6 Fatigue is a major factor in performance decrements and cognitive decline.…”
Section: Variables Selectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have conducted a series of empirical studies aimed at understanding how to engineer computer systems to successfully aid students in learning how to solve complex problems (Smith, Galdes, Fraser, et al, 1991;Smith, Miller, Fraser, et al, 1991). The studies presented here provide data regarding the teaching effectiveness of an expert-system-based tutor, the Transfusion Medicine Tutor (TMT), when used by medical technology students to learn an important problem-solving task, the identification of alloantibodies in a patient's blood for the purpose of finding compatible blood for transfbsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In preparation for designing a computer system to support blood bankers in identifying antibodies, background studies were performed to learn what characteristics of the task make the problem-solving difficult (Miller et al, 1993;Smith et al, 1991a;Smith et al, 1991b). It was found that antibody identification can be characterized as an abductive reasoning task, where one must reason to the best explanation of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%