2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00047-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with new treatments for cancer: a feasibility study of daily diary measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Stone and colleagues (2003) noted high rates of noncompliance with paper diaries when the study protocol called for four assessments each day for 21 consecutive days, we assert that our participants were more likely to be compliant because of the decreased burden associated with our protocol (i.e., one assessment per day for eight days), and previous research noting the high levels of compliance with paper diaries when only one assessment per day is required (e.g., Sherliker & Steptoe, 2000). In addition, given the NAS participants' history of compliance with this longitudinal study over the past 40 years (of the survivors, over 90% are continuing participants, most of the men who are continuing participants report to the Boston VA every three years for a biomedical exam and complete a number of questionnaires either mailed a month in advance or administered the day of the exam) it is unlikely that they waited until the eighth day to complete all of their diaries.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Although Stone and colleagues (2003) noted high rates of noncompliance with paper diaries when the study protocol called for four assessments each day for 21 consecutive days, we assert that our participants were more likely to be compliant because of the decreased burden associated with our protocol (i.e., one assessment per day for eight days), and previous research noting the high levels of compliance with paper diaries when only one assessment per day is required (e.g., Sherliker & Steptoe, 2000). In addition, given the NAS participants' history of compliance with this longitudinal study over the past 40 years (of the survivors, over 90% are continuing participants, most of the men who are continuing participants report to the Boston VA every three years for a biomedical exam and complete a number of questionnaires either mailed a month in advance or administered the day of the exam) it is unlikely that they waited until the eighth day to complete all of their diaries.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In contrast, some respondents used the MSSID as a tool to monitor and understand their own symptoms, supporting findings from previous diary studies [20][21][22][23]. For these respondents, the MSSID became more than just a data collection method for the researcher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Fewer studies have considered the utility of completing a diary from the perspective of the respondent. In this respect, the process of writing a diary can provide respondents with an outlet to their emotions, and can be a useful monitoring tool that enables them to gain more insight into their condition [20][21][22][23]. Diary completion is one component of educational interventions that aim to help people with cancer to manage and cope with their pain [24].…”
Section: Advantages Of Diary Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used daily assessments, but they have tended to focus on only one or a few symptoms [26,50]. Daily diaries used in cancer pain management [51,52] and clinical trials [53,54] have been found to be acceptable to participants and provide evidence of daily variability in responses.…”
Section: Ac Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%