2006
DOI: 10.1080/13607860500409682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the Columbia shuttle disaster on the daily lives of older adults: Findings from the VA Normative Aging Study

Abstract: During 2002-2003 the VA Normative Aging Study conducted an eight-day diary survey of stressors and well-being. A sub-sample of 19 men and 13 women (mean age = 71.78) completed daily questionnaires before and after the Columbia shuttle exploded on 1st February 2003, presenting a unique look into peoples' daily lives before and after a tragic event. Results indicated no significant changes in negative affect or physical symptoms, but people reported significant decreases in both positive affect and memory failur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each person, for each day, we first computed the sum of all stressors reported (M = 0.85, SD = 1.10, range: 0-7); we also computed five dichotomous dummy variables that indicated whether the different types of stressors (i.e., interpersonal stressors, demands, network stressors, health stressors, and other) occurred. We chose to use the frequency of stressors as an index of stressor exposure, which is (a) consistent with previous work (e.g., Neupert et al, 2006aNeupert et al, , 2006b), (b) maintains the maximum range of the exposure scale, and (c) allows for the examination of cumulative effects of multiple stressors. If participants reported that a stressor had occurred, they were also asked how stressful the event was for them (1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = somewhat, 4 = very), which is a subjective appraisal of stressor severity (e.g., Lazarus, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For each person, for each day, we first computed the sum of all stressors reported (M = 0.85, SD = 1.10, range: 0-7); we also computed five dichotomous dummy variables that indicated whether the different types of stressors (i.e., interpersonal stressors, demands, network stressors, health stressors, and other) occurred. We chose to use the frequency of stressors as an index of stressor exposure, which is (a) consistent with previous work (e.g., Neupert et al, 2006aNeupert et al, , 2006b), (b) maintains the maximum range of the exposure scale, and (c) allows for the examination of cumulative effects of multiple stressors. If participants reported that a stressor had occurred, they were also asked how stressful the event was for them (1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = somewhat, 4 = very), which is a subjective appraisal of stressor severity (e.g., Lazarus, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a subsample of participants (n = 32) were completing the diaries when the Columbia Shuttle exploded on February 1, 2003. As reported elsewhere (Neupert et al, 2006b), this event was recorded by some of the participants as a stressor which fell into the "other" category. Although speculative, these events appear to generally capture truly external circumstances which are beyond one's control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations