2018
DOI: 10.2298/ijgi1801067i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with natural disasters: A cross-sectional study with people with disabilities in the coastal zone of Bangladesh

Abstract: Coastal zone of Bangladesh is highly vulnerable to different nature induced hydrological and climatological disasters. Disaster disproportionately affects a different group of populations. Among them, "people with disabilities" (PWDs) regardless of their gender face severe challenges in a disaster situation. The response mechanisms of disabled people in disaster context are also different. This paper aimed to examine the coping strategies of PWDs with a natural disaster in the coastal zone of Bangladesh. We co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Households with disabled/chronically ill members are more vulnerable to natural disasters than others (Islam et al 2018). The findings of this study suggest that the likelihood of evacuation was higher among households with disabled/ill members.…”
Section: Factors Associated With Evacuationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Households with disabled/chronically ill members are more vulnerable to natural disasters than others (Islam et al 2018). The findings of this study suggest that the likelihood of evacuation was higher among households with disabled/ill members.…”
Section: Factors Associated With Evacuationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A study examining the coping strategies of 150 individuals with disabilities during natural disasters in the coastal areas of Bangladesh, particularly in the Mongla, Rampal, and Sharankhola regions of the Bagerhat district, reported that a significant proportion of respondents (60%) did not receive disaster preparedness training. However, the majority (88%) were aware of the nearest government-designated disaster shelters and sought refuge there before or during the disaster [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%