Coping with Complex Environmental and Societal Flood Risk Management Decisions: An Integrated Multi-criteria Framework

Abstract

During recent years, a great deal of attention has been focused on the financial risk management of natural disasters. One reason behind is that the economic losses from floods, windstorms, earthquakes and other disasters in both the developing and developed countries are escalating dramatically. It has become apparent that an integrated water resource management approach would be beneficial in order to take both the best interests of society and of the environment into consideration. One improvement consists of models capable of handling multiple criteria (conflicting objectives) as well as multiple stakeholders (conflicting interests). A systems approach is applied for coping with complex environmental and societal risk management decisions with respect to flood catastrophe policy formation, wherein the emphasis is on computer-based modeling and simulation techniques combined with methods for evaluating strategies where numerous stakeholders are incorporated in the process. The resulting framework consists of a simulation model, a decision analytical tool, and a set of suggested policy strategies for policy formulation. The framework will aid decision makers with high risk complex environmental decisions subject to significant uncertainties. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2011, 3 1358

Policy analysis on the fly with an online multicriteria cardinal ranking tool

“…For instance, Danielson, Ekenberg, Ekengren, Hökby, and Lidén () propose the analytical decision layer process, incorporating the stakeholders and decision maker views in an interaction layer and aggregating these preferences in a decision layer‐exploiting methods from interval decision analysis to accommodate for differing preferences such that all decision maker values are captured by each interval. Hansson, Larsson, Danielson, and Ekenberg () presents an MCDA approach for evaluating flood management strategies, putting weights on the stakeholders when aggregating their preferences. Schroeder and Lambert () outlines a decision analysis process for comparison of transportation policies in the case of an emergency exploiting scenario planning in order to set the context.…”

Adapting a holistic approach to flood management in the Hawkesbury–Nepean region: complexities and perceptions of the agencies involved

“…This leads to poor communication and coordination between public and private organisations in Australia (Box, Thomalla, and Van den Honert 2013) and has been identified in other research studies (e.g. Hansson et al 2011;USACE 2012).…”

An Emergency Decision-Making Method for Urban Rainstorm Water-Logging: A China Study

“…At the first stage, case-based reasoning (CBR) is used to generate preliminary emergency plans and, at the second stage, the emergency plan is adjusted dynamically through prospect theory in which it is considered that individuals will have different risk attitudes based on different locations of reference points. Anderssonroswall et al [34] believed that a systematic approach should be adopted to address the complex environmental and social risk management decisions resulting from flood hazard policies and proposed a comprehensive multi-criteria framework that includes simulation models, decision analysis tools, and a set of policy-making recommendations. Moreover, multi-attribute decision-making methods are also commonly used in emergency decision-making processes, which have been applied in many disciplines such as economics [35], military [36], industry [37], and logistics [38], etc.…”