Coping Strategies against Peer Victimization: Differences According to Gender, Grade, Victimization Status and Perceived Classroom Social Climate

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) include “Good Health and Well-being” (SDG3) and “Quality Education” (SDG4). Nevertheless, many students cannot achieve these goals if they suffer peer victimization at their schools, and intervention programs to reduce it are necessary. These programs should consider the possible differences in the coping strategies preferred by students according to some personal (e.g., gender, grade, victimization status) and contextual (e.g., perceived classroom social climate) factors to be more effective. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the possible differences in the coping strategies preferred by students (ask a friend for help, ask a teacher for help, ask parents for help, not ask anyone for help, fighting back, avoid the aggressor and ask the aggressor why) to handle situations of relational, physical and verbal peer victimization according to their gender, school grade, victimization status and perceived classroom social climate. The sample comprised 479 students (52.2% boys, 47.8% girls) aged from 9 to 14 years (M = 11.21, SD = 1.52). The results showed that girls chose the strategies of asking friends or adults for help and asking the aggressor why more than boys, while boys chose the strategies of fighting back and not ask anyone for help more than girls. The coping strategy of asking a teacher for help was preferred more by students of lower school grades and by students with a positive perception of the classroom climate. Victimized students preferred the strategy of not asking anyone for help. These results may be useful for developing more effective intervention programs. These programs should aim to enhance the teacher–student relationship in upper school grades, help victimized students to inform about peer aggression situations and improve perceived classroom social climate.

Gender differences in social environmental factors of psychological distress among Indonesian adolescents: Findings from the 2015 Global School-based Student Health Survey

“…Stronger associations between the experience of being physically attacked and psychological distress among girls in this present study might be due to gender-typical behaviours. Girls were less likely to cope with physical aggression by themselves, whereas boys tend to fight back the peer aggressor as a coping strategy (Cava et al, 2021).…”

Families, Parenting and Aggressive Preschoolers: A Scoping Review of Studies Examining Family Variables Related to Preschool Aggression

“…Insight into how family variables relate to aggressive behaviours during the pre-primary educational stages is crucial for gaining a better understanding of the associated risk factors and protective mechanisms that can improve the prevention and intervention methods [ 37 , 38 ] and prevent spillover to the later educational stages [ 39 ]. In light of this need, a scoping review is an ideal way to determine the nature and volume of research, and thus, gauge the current state of knowledge in this field.…”

Exploring the longitudinal relationship between anger rumination and peer victimization when controlling for sadness rumination

“…In addition, social support seeking is one mechanism that could also protect victimized girls of greater anger rumination over time. Research shows that female victims are usually more willing to seek social support from parents, teachers and friends (Cava et al, 2021). Problem-oriented coping strategies, including help-seeking are negatively related with anger rumination (Givi et al, 2014).…”