“…That being said, scholars have used a wide range of identity theories to explain aspects of identity conflict, and we privileged the dominant approaches. However, we recognize that there are several other theories that could shed new light on the outcomes of and responses to identity conflict but have, as of yet, only been used sparingly, for example, conservation of resources (Chen et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2020; McAllister et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2021), discursive/narrative theory (Humphreys & Brown, 2002; Kourti et al, 2018; Trent, 2012; Walker, 2001; Wright et al, 2012), and psychodynamic and psychoanalytic theory (Barnard & Flotman, 2020; Brown, 2006; Hollway, 2010). We hope that future research can use the theoretical underpinnings that we have spelled out as stepping stones to future theoretical advancements through either more fully leveraging the dominant theories explicated here or drawing on additional theoretical traditions.…”