“…It could be hypothesised that SM muscles work from the earliest stage until the pharyngeal phase of swallowing. Additionally, the duration of the entire swallowing test was similar to the values demonstrated in previous similar studies without differences between genders …”
Swallowing is a muscular activity that occurs both after mastication and spontaneously as a result of saliva accumulation. Spontaneous saliva swallowing occurs about every 2 minutes. Comprehension of its functional mechanisms is relevant to assess their modification in clinical situations. A standardised surface electromyographical (ssEMG) protocol for the evaluation of this muscle activity is lacking. Aims of the present study are: (i) to determine the reproducibility of a ssEMG protocol for the evaluation of the oral phase of saliva swallowing and (ii) to evaluate the activity of masseter (MM), anterior temporalis (TA), submental muscles (SM) to draw a reference model of swallowing. Standardised surface electromyographical activity of MM, TA and SM during swallowing of saliva spontaneously accumulated was recorded in 20 healthy participants. Functional indexes including symmetry (POC), recruitment (Impact), duration of activation of each couple of muscles and of the whole exercise, position, intensity of the spike were computed. Inter- and intra-appointment reliabilities were assessed and method errors calculated. Descriptive statistics, sex- and muscles-related comparisons were carried out. Standardised surface electromyographical assessment of MM, TA and SM muscles was reliable. A high inter-individual variability was found. Percentage overlapping coefficient (POC) values were close to 80% for TA and SM, higher than for MM (P < .001). Impact values ranged between 16.4% and 30.7%, and differences were found between muscles (P < .001). The global muscle activity during swallowing lasted between 1.5 and 1.8 seconds. For each couple of muscles, the duration of activation ranged between 0.7 and 1.6 seconds and muscles-related differences were found (P < .001). The spike of activation for each couple of muscle ranged between 35.7% and 44.2% of the duration. The protocol was reliable and intra-participants repeatable measures can be carried out. Due to the high inter-participants variability, further analyses are needed to draw a model of muscular activity.
“…It could be hypothesised that SM muscles work from the earliest stage until the pharyngeal phase of swallowing. Additionally, the duration of the entire swallowing test was similar to the values demonstrated in previous similar studies without differences between genders …”
Swallowing is a muscular activity that occurs both after mastication and spontaneously as a result of saliva accumulation. Spontaneous saliva swallowing occurs about every 2 minutes. Comprehension of its functional mechanisms is relevant to assess their modification in clinical situations. A standardised surface electromyographical (ssEMG) protocol for the evaluation of this muscle activity is lacking. Aims of the present study are: (i) to determine the reproducibility of a ssEMG protocol for the evaluation of the oral phase of saliva swallowing and (ii) to evaluate the activity of masseter (MM), anterior temporalis (TA), submental muscles (SM) to draw a reference model of swallowing. Standardised surface electromyographical activity of MM, TA and SM during swallowing of saliva spontaneously accumulated was recorded in 20 healthy participants. Functional indexes including symmetry (POC), recruitment (Impact), duration of activation of each couple of muscles and of the whole exercise, position, intensity of the spike were computed. Inter- and intra-appointment reliabilities were assessed and method errors calculated. Descriptive statistics, sex- and muscles-related comparisons were carried out. Standardised surface electromyographical assessment of MM, TA and SM muscles was reliable. A high inter-individual variability was found. Percentage overlapping coefficient (POC) values were close to 80% for TA and SM, higher than for MM (P < .001). Impact values ranged between 16.4% and 30.7%, and differences were found between muscles (P < .001). The global muscle activity during swallowing lasted between 1.5 and 1.8 seconds. For each couple of muscles, the duration of activation ranged between 0.7 and 1.6 seconds and muscles-related differences were found (P < .001). The spike of activation for each couple of muscle ranged between 35.7% and 44.2% of the duration. The protocol was reliable and intra-participants repeatable measures can be carried out. Due to the high inter-participants variability, further analyses are needed to draw a model of muscular activity.
“…4 is that pressure profiles at the front of the palate (position 6) were more variable than at the mid-or hind palate, and that the pressure change at the mid-palate (position 7) was the smallest. This agreed well with the results from a recent X-ray microbeam study by Wilson and Green [19]. They observed greater similarity in the movement patterns of markers placed on the posterior of the tongue than of markers placed on the anterior.…”
Bolus propulsion during the normal oral phase of swallowing is thought to be characterised by the sequential elevation of the front, middle, and posterior regions of the dorsum of the tongue. However, the coordinated orchestration of lingual movement is still poorly understood. This study examined how pressures generated by the tongue against the hard palate differed between three points along the midline of the tongue. Specifically, we tested three hypotheses: (1) that there are defined individual patterns of pressure change within the mouth during liquid swallowing; (2) that there are significant negative pressures generated at defined moments during normal swallowing; and, (3) that liquid swallowing is governed by the interplay of pressures generated in an anteroposterior direction in the mouth. Using a metal appliance described previously, we measured absolute pressures during water swallows in six healthy volunteers (4 male, 2 female) with an age range of 25-35 years. Participants performed three 10-ml water swallows from a small cup on five separate days, thus providing data for a total of 15 separate water swallows. There was a distinct pattern to the each of the pressure signals, and this pattern was preserved in the mean obtained when the data were pooled. Furthermore, raw signals from the same subjects presented consistent patterns at each of the five testing sessions. In all subjects, pressure at the anterior and hind palate tended to be negative relative to the preswallow value; at mid-palate, however, pressure changes were less consistent between individuals. When the pressure differences between the sites were calculated, we found that during the swallow a net negative pressure difference developed between anterior and mid-palate and a net positive pressure difference developed between mid-palate and hind palate. Large, rapid fluctuations in pressure occurred at all sites and these varied several-fold between subjects. When the brief sharp reduction in pressure that occurred early in each swallow was used to determine the sequence of events, we found that activity occurred first at the anterior of the palate followed by the mid-palate and then the hind palate. There was a considerably longer and more variable delay between the start of activity at the front of the palate than at the rear of the palate. To obtain an index of the "effort" involved in generating the pressures at each site regardless of direction (positive or negative), we obtained the product of the root mean square (RMS) pressure change during each swallow (kPa) and its duration (s). Overall, the most effort appears to have occurred at the front of the palate and the least at mid-palate. Our results also showed that some participants exerted a small amount of midline pressure when swallowing, while others used a relatively large amount of tongue pressure. We conclude that while tongue behaviour during swallowing follows a classical sequence of rapid shape changes intended to contain and then propel the bolus from the oral cavity to th...
“…A 6DOF sensor was securely placed on the head to serve as a reference sensor to register head movements and re-express the 3D tongue and jaw data relative to a head-based coordinate system using the Northern Digital, Inc. system default settings. Prior research in healthy populations has shown that swallow function is not affected by tongue sensor placement [22] and that the use of only two sensors is adequate to determine differences in movements between anterior and posterior portions of the tongue [15]. Two 5DOF tongue sensors were attached to the tongue (see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), and was defined as the temporal lag between the initiation of anterior lingual elevation and the initiation of posterior lingual elevation [15, 25]. Fig.…”
Early identification of bulbar involvement in persons with ALS is critical for improving diagnosis and prognosis; however, efficacious diagnostic markers have not yet been identified. The purpose of this study was to determine whether kinematic changes of the tongue and jaw during swallowing, measured using 3D electromagnetic articulography (EMA), predate clinically identifiable symptoms of speech and swallowing impairment in persons diagnosed with ALS. Data were collected from 16 adults diagnosed with ALS and 18 neurotypical controls. Groups were aged matched. Eligible participants with ALS were tolerating an unrestricted diet (FOIS = 7), produced intelligible speech (> 97%), and had a speaking rate greater than 150 words per minute. Participants completed a 3-mL water swallow task, during which EMA recorded kinematic measures of the anterior and posterior regions of tongue including lingual speed, range of motion, duration, coordination, and efficiency. Jaw speed and range of motion were also recorded. Persons diagnosed with ALS demonstrated reduced posterior lingual range of motion (11.40 mm ± 4.01 vs. 16.07 mm ± 5.27), slower posterior lingual speeds (83.67 mm/s ± 47.96 vs. 141.35 mm/s ± 66.54), increased lingual movement duration (13.46 s ± 6.75 vs. 9.21 s ± 3.28), and reduced lingual coordination (0.04 s ± 0.11 vs. 17 s ± 0.19) during the 3-oz water swallow task compared to controls. Persons diagnosed with ALS demonstrated increased range of motion (9.86 mm ± 5.38 vs. 6 mm ± 3.78) and increased jaw speed (68.62 mm/s ± 50.13 vs. 34.72 mm/s ± 17.75) during swallowing compared to controls. The current findings suggest that changes in lingual and jaw motor performance during a simple water swallow task are present in persons with ALS who are pre-symptomatic of clinically detectable bulbar impairment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
