Coordination of Supply Chains with Competing Manufacturers considering Fairness Concerns

Jian, Jie; Zhang, Yuyao; Jiang, Li; Su, Jiafu

doi:10.1155/2020/4372603

Cited by 30 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on this, this study started from the perspective of enterprise management capabilities and explored the path to achieve the “win–win” goal of corporate environmental performance and financial performance under the intermediary transmission of enterprise environmental protection investment. In addition, existing research in China mainly uses the nature of enterprise property rights [ 12 ] and shareholding structure [ 13 ] as the moderating variables of the relationship between internal control quality and enterprise performance, or uses the enterprise social responsibility [ 14 ], agency costs [ 15 ], and overconfidence of management [ 16 ] as the intermediary variables. The above studies lack the practical needs based on the construction of ecological civilization and fail to organically link the three relationships by using enterprise environmental protection investment as an intermediary variable.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal Control Quality, Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment and Finance Performance: An Empirical Study of China’s A-Share Heavy Pollution Industry

Yang

Qin

Gan

et al. 2020

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As an important measure of enterprise governance, internal control can enhance the organizational rationality of the enterprise, ensure that the enterprise consciously assumes social responsibility for the protection of the natural environment and resources, and promote the sustainable development of the national economy. Using data from China’s A-share heavy pollution industry listed companies from 2009 to 2018, this study explored the relationships among internal control quality, enterprise environmental protection investment, and financial performance. The results show that the quality of internal control has a significant positive impact on enterprise environmental protection investment and financial performance. Enterprise environmental protection investment has a significant positive impact on financial performance and plays a partial intermediary role in the positive impact of internal control quality on financial performance. While expanding the theory of resource-based concepts, this study clarified the positive impact of corporate environmental management and practical behavior on corporate value and provides a theoretical basis for companies to actively implement environmental protection responsibilities, strengthen internal environmental management capabilities, and enhance corporate value. At the same time, it also provides a basis for the government to issue relevant environmental protection policies, strengthen enterprise internal control construction guidelines, and encourage third-party organizations to evaluate the effectiveness of enterprise internal control.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal Control Quality, Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment and Finance Performance: An Empirical Study of China’s A-Share Heavy Pollution Industry

Yang

Qin

Gan

et al. 2020

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Su et al [33] propose a cost profit-sharing contract to coordinate a closed-loop supply chain with third-party recycling, taking environmental protection factors into account. Jian et al [34] design a revenuesharing contract to coordinate a supply chain with competing manufacturers, considering the manufacturer's peer-induced fairness concern model and the manufacturer's distributional fairness concern model. Coordination of SC under cost information asymmetry has also attracted the attention of researchers.…”

Section: Sc Coordinationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decisions and Coordination in a Capacity Sharing Supply Chain considering Production Cost Misreporting

Zhao

Han

2020

Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the manufacturing capacity sharing platform, considering the manufacturing capacity provider’s cost misreporting behavior and the collusion behavior of the platform operator, this paper built a supply chain consisting of a platform operator, a capacity provider with surplus capacity, and a manufacturer with insufficient capacity. This paper studied the influence of the cost misreporting behavior on the supply chain members’ decisions and profits. By use of the game theory, in the scenarios including the supplier misreporting to other supply chain members and the supplier colluding with the platform, the paper analyzed the optimal pricing decision, misreporting coefficient decision, and platform’s service fee decision and further compared the profits of the supply chain and its members. The results show that the capacity provider tends to overstate the production cost for gaining more profits, which exerts negative effects on profits of other members and the supply chain. Compared with the case of misreporting to both the manufacturer with insufficient capacity and the platform, the case of colluding with platform is more favorable to the profits of the manufacturer, the platform, and the supply chain, while the supplier prefers to choose the former situation. When the sales revenue-sharing proportion, cost-sharing proportion, and service fee satisfy certain conditions, the sales revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contract can avoid the capacity provider’s cost misreporting behavior and coordinate the supply chain.

show abstract

“…Revenue-sharing contracts were used to resolve channel conflicts in dual-channel supply chains [31]. Jian et al [32] examined the contract coordination between manufacturers with peerinduced and distributional fairness concerns and found that there is a revenue-sharing contract parameter in both the peer-induced and distributional fairness concerns of manufacturers.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination considering Anticipated Regret under Price Discount

Jian

Zhang

et al. 2020

Complexity

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing homogeneous product market has made more competition among companies to focus on improving customers’ experience. In order to get more competitive advantages, companies often launch discount products to attract consumers. However, stimulated by discount products, the perception of anticipated regret is becoming stronger, which is an inevitable issue in front of companies with price discount strategy. Considering the impact of anticipated regret for discount products, this paper quantitatively describes the utility functions and deduces the demand functions of original price products and discount products. The theoretical analysis and numerical simulation are used to analyze centralized and decentralized models of supply chain for discount products. On its basis, the revenue-sharing contract is designed to optimize the profits of supply chain. This paper finds that the price of products increases first and then decreases with the increase of regret sensitivity coefficient and consumer heterogeneity. When the regret sensitivity coefficient and consumer heterogeneity are lower, companies in the supply chain can adopt the “skimming pricing” strategy in order to obtain more profits. When the regret sensitivity coefficient and consumer heterogeneity increase, companies in the supply chain can adopt “penetrating pricing” strategies to stimulate market demand. For high regret consumers, manufacturers can adopt a “commitment advertising” strategy to promise price and quality, and retailers can adopt a “prestige pricing” strategy to reduce consumer perception of regret. In response to products with higher differences in consumer acceptance, manufacturers can adopt a “differentiated customization” strategy to meet different types of consumer demand and retailers can adopt a “differential pricing” strategy for precise marketing.

show abstract

Coordination of Supply Chains with Competing Manufacturers considering Fairness Concerns

Cited by 30 publications

References 31 publications

Internal Control Quality, Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment and Finance Performance: An Empirical Study of China’s A-Share Heavy Pollution Industry

Internal Control Quality, Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment and Finance Performance: An Empirical Study of China’s A-Share Heavy Pollution Industry

Decisions and Coordination in a Capacity Sharing Supply Chain considering Production Cost Misreporting

Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination considering Anticipated Regret under Price Discount

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About