Coordination of sanitation investment decisions with broader water resources management

Abstract

Water pollution affects water security, reducing water supply to economic water uses and threatening environmental preservation and human health. Controlling water pollution depends on efforts on two main sectors. One is water management, which provides regulatory instruments, including water quality standards, water abstraction and water discharge permits, as well as economic instruments, like water and wastewater charges. Another is sanitation, which is responsible for expansion of water and wastewater infrastructure and faces challenges in financing extensive infrastructure. While water management defines broader (watershed scale) strategies to address water quality, other decisions regarding infrastructure investment are made by the sanitation sector at the municipality scale, with limited perception of broader watershed context on water availability and pollution. When water management and sanitation decisions are not coordinated there are missed opportunities to (a) meet water quality standards at given river reaches due to lacking investment upstream and (b) find least cost investment solutions across municipalities, at the watershed scale. In this paper, we present methods and solutions to coordinate wastewater infrastructure expansion planning with water management instruments in the long-term planning to maximize economic returns and improve water quality. Our methods identify the regions where investments could be prioritized, coordinated with the distribution of water permits and definition of water quality targets. Results show that restricting water permits on some watershed regions results in a small water availability trade-off for economic uses but a significant reduction in costs to sanitation investments, while also meeting the water quality targets. We conclude that while there are several ways to reach predefined water quality targets, each way requires well-coordinated decisions from the water management perspective (where and when to allocate water permits) and the sanitation sector (where and when to concentrate investments in wastewater treatment). Thus, as important as the decisions to improve water management instruments and to increase investments in sanitation is their coordination towards a common watershed goal

Os serviços de gestão de recursos hídricos

“…Enquanto os serviços de saneamento, cuja área de abrangência é do município, normalmente observam o escopo geográfico do mesmo, os serviços de gestão e ecossistêmicos têm como escopo toda a bacia hidrográfica (Figura 3), o que inclui municípios e áreas urbanas e rurais, ou ainda sistema hídrico interligado em casos de transposição de bacias. A sobreposição de escopos geográficos entre os três serviços considerados requer assim estratégias conjuntas e integradas para a tomada de decisão e investimentos, a exemplo daquelas analisadas em Dalcin & Marques (2020) e Grangeiro et al (2020). Para que uma empresa de saneamento possa prestar os respectivos serviços e transformar em resultados os investimentos feitos, é necessário que a água bruta esteja disponível no rio com um nível mínimo de confiabilidade em termos qualidade e quantidade.…”