2021
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination of -1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting by transcript and nascent chain features revealed by deep mutational scanning

Abstract: Programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is a translational recoding mechanism that enables the synthesis of multiple polypeptides from a single transcript. During translation of the alphavirus structural polyprotein, the efficiency of −1PRF is coordinated by a ‘slippery’ sequence in the transcript, an adjacent RNA stem–loop, and a conformational transition in the nascent polypeptide chain. To characterize each of these effectors, we measured the effects of 4530 mutations on −1PRF by deep mutational scanning. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further refining this idea with a focus on HIV-1, Léger et al provided a possible mechanistic explanation showing that the 3 nucleotide preceding the slippery sequence, those occupied by the ribosomal E-Site upon slipping (A,B, and C in the A-BCX-XXY-YYZ) can increase or decrease the relative rate of frameshifting ( 52 ). These findings are largely supported by the recent work of Carmody et al whose deep mutational scan of the ~300 nucleotide upstream of the slippery sequence in Sindbis virus (SINV) shows that altering the identity of these nucleotides can dramatically impact the observed rate of −1 PRF ( 53 ). These findings raise questions then about how MFE design choices could directly impact observed frameshifting efficiencies and mechanisms.…”
Section: How Do We Experimentally Identify and Evaluate Frameshifting?mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Further refining this idea with a focus on HIV-1, Léger et al provided a possible mechanistic explanation showing that the 3 nucleotide preceding the slippery sequence, those occupied by the ribosomal E-Site upon slipping (A,B, and C in the A-BCX-XXY-YYZ) can increase or decrease the relative rate of frameshifting ( 52 ). These findings are largely supported by the recent work of Carmody et al whose deep mutational scan of the ~300 nucleotide upstream of the slippery sequence in Sindbis virus (SINV) shows that altering the identity of these nucleotides can dramatically impact the observed rate of −1 PRF ( 53 ). These findings raise questions then about how MFE design choices could directly impact observed frameshifting efficiencies and mechanisms.…”
Section: How Do We Experimentally Identify and Evaluate Frameshifting?mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…5 However, it remains unclear how the conformational effects of ΔF508 result in direct modifications of translation and vice versa. In light of the recent discovery that conformational transitions in the nascent chain can stimulate -1PRF, 14,15,30 we searched the CFTR transcript for structural features that might promote ribosomal frameshifting. Our findings identified a slippery sequence (SSC) and stem-loop (SL2) that stimulate ribosomal frameshifting and the premature translational termination (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent findings show that the mechanical forces generated by cotranslational folding can stimulate -1PRF, 14,15 which minimally requires a slippery sequence within the mRNA and an adjacent stem-loop. 17 To identify potential RF sites in the CFTR transcript we first searched for consensus or near-consensus X1 XXY4 YYZ7 slippery sequences, where XXX and YYY are nucleobase triplets and Z can be any nucleobase.…”
Section: Discovery Of An Active -1 Ribosomal Frameshift Site In the C...mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have been used to examine activities of proteins, such as protein-protein interaction (PPI) (6)(7)(8), E3 ubiquitin ligase activity (8), protein abundance (7,9), receptor binding (10), aggregation (11,12), and activity within signaling pathways (13). The functional assays used to achieve enrichment or depletion of variants are equally diverse and include for example fitness or cell growth (6,7,11,12), different reporter assays coupled with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (9,10,13,14), and protein display (8,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%