2022
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02468-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abracadabra, One Becomes Two: The Importance of Context in Viral −1 Programmed Ribosomal Frameshifting

Abstract: The constrained nature of viral genomes has allowed a translational sleight of hand known as −1 Programmed Ribosomal Frameshifting (−1 PRF) to flourish. Numerous studies have sought to tease apart the mechanisms and implications of −1PRF utilizing a few techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can obscure important contributions from distal elements and lead to unexpected, reporter-derived artifacts. The importance of context in −1PRF has been discussed recently in an excellent review (152).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can obscure important contributions from distal elements and lead to unexpected, reporter-derived artifacts. The importance of context in −1PRF has been discussed recently in an excellent review (152).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is important to consider a general limitation of the dual luciferase approach: viral RNA can have, as well, long distance interaction. For instance, the interaction between the 3 untranslated region (UTR) and the 5 UTR of different flaviviruses is fundamental for viral replication [56], or distal elements can play a role in the modulation of the PRF [57], and these functions will not be evaluated by cloning only the small RNA portion of interest. This critical aspect was further evidenced by recent research showing that a dual luciferase assay, in which a portion of 88 nucleotides or 2 kb of the −1 PRF of SARS-CoV-2, resulted in a drastically different rate of frameshift (17% vs. 42%) [32].…”
Section: Phenotypic Assays: Dual Luciferase Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite strong limitations on spontaneous ribosomal frameshifting, many RNA viruses evade this by programming ribosomes to shift into alternate reading frames, often at frequencies of three orders of magnitude greater than the background rate, through a process called Programmed Ribosomal Frameshifting (PRF) [12][13][14][15]. It is generally accepted that RNA viruses use PRF to maximize their gene expression programs without altering their genomes [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%