The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination and RedOx ratio of iron in sodium‐silicate glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous articles that studied the effect of total Fe-content in sodium-silicate glasses, the reduced samples investigated here have a g = 2 signal shape similar to the one observed at higher iron content ([Fe 2 O 3 ] > 1 mol%). [17,18] In these high Fe-glasses, Fe 3+ -rich clusters have been shown by optical absorption and Mössbauer spectroscopic properties [49] and confirmed by neutron diffraction and numerical simulations. [50] The present study shows that, in reduced samples, residual Fe 3+ tends to segregate, with an EPR signature similar to that in concentrated glasses.…”
Section: Clustering Vs Isolated Sitesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to previous articles that studied the effect of total Fe-content in sodium-silicate glasses, the reduced samples investigated here have a g = 2 signal shape similar to the one observed at higher iron content ([Fe 2 O 3 ] > 1 mol%). [17,18] In these high Fe-glasses, Fe 3+ -rich clusters have been shown by optical absorption and Mössbauer spectroscopic properties [49] and confirmed by neutron diffraction and numerical simulations. [50] The present study shows that, in reduced samples, residual Fe 3+ tends to segregate, with an EPR signature similar to that in concentrated glasses.…”
Section: Clustering Vs Isolated Sitesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[14][15][16] The attribution of the feature at g = 2 is less clear. [17] Different scenarios have been proposed: (i) a signal due to exchange-coupled pairs or clusters of more than two atoms [18] involving edge-or face-sharing Fe 3+ sites [16,19,20]. These clusters could be trimers [21] up to nano-clusters as in ferritine [22], nanoparticles [23] or obsidian wt.% glasses [7,24]; (ii) a paramagnetic signal due to Fe 3+ in axially distorted sites (E/D ~ 0) [19], this signal being enhanced by dipole-dipole interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-monotonic behavior T g vs. Fe content can be explained with the results of structural investigations. The environment of Fe(III) in soda-silica glasses doped with iron were detail studied by Dunaeva et al [23,30]. As the results of Mössbauer spectroscopy, EPR and XANES/EXAFS, it was shown that in the glasses with low iron content (under 4 wt.% Fe 2 O 3 ) CN N 4, moreover, in the region under 1 wt.% Fe 2 O 3 isolated Fe(III) predominate over clustered, in the area between 1 and 4 wt.% their quantities are comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is analogous to one described in [23], so we believe that compositions of glasses correspond to the initial raw batch. The mixtures were prepared from analytically pure materials.…”
Section: Glassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation