2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diluted Fe 3+ in silicate glasses: Structural effects of Fe-redox state and matrix composition. An optical absorption and X-band/Q-band EPR study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these trends are conspicuous in our simulation data, a direct comparison with structure data obtained with silicate glasses is not fully satisfying because the glassy state can induce a structural reorganization around some cations (e.g. Benmore et al, 2010;Vercamer et al, 2015). Only a few studies, using in situ X-ray or neutron diffraction techniques, give some insights on the structure of silicate melts at liquidus temperature …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although these trends are conspicuous in our simulation data, a direct comparison with structure data obtained with silicate glasses is not fully satisfying because the glassy state can induce a structural reorganization around some cations (e.g. Benmore et al, 2010;Vercamer et al, 2015). Only a few studies, using in situ X-ray or neutron diffraction techniques, give some insights on the structure of silicate melts at liquidus temperature …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the case of iron ions with M Fe2aO3 > ∼0.3 wt%, many measurements have been performed on the various types of glass fabricated under various processing conditions by using nonelement‐specific or element‐specific methods, including transmittance_ UV‐NIR measurements, X‐ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) pre‐edge (the lower energy region below the absorption edge) measurements, Mössbauer spectroscopy, neutron diffraction measurements, electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements, and nuclear magnetic resonance measurements . Some of these experimental results have not been able to be explained in terms of the commonly accepted understanding described above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these experimental results have not been able to be explained in terms of the commonly accepted understanding described above. This has led to many models having been proposed, including ones incorporating medium‐range structures around the iron ions or different/additional coordinations of iron ions . For example, they include combinations of three to five neighboring atoms around the target iron ion over the M Fe2O3 range between 0.3 and 4 wt%, such as clusters of Fe 3+ for M Fe2O3 of 1.5 wt% or higher, polymerization (clustering) with a five‐atoms combination of Fe 3+ with a 4‐coordination number of four (Fe 3+ ) with bridging oxygen (BO) to Si (Fe 3+ –BO–Fe 3+ –BO–Si), and an Fe–O–Fe structure with strong bonding .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations