2020
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201905453
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinating Ability of Anions, Solvents, Amino Acids, and Gases towards Alkaline and Alkaline‐Earth Elements, Transition Metals, and Lanthanides

Abstract: After briefly reviewing the applications of the coordination ability indices proposed earlier for anions and solvents toward transition metals and lanthanides, a new analysis of crystal structures is applied now to a much larger number of coordinating species: anions (including those that are present in ionic solvents), solvents, amino acids, gases, and a sample of neutral ligands. The coordinating ability towards s‐block elements is now also considered. The effect of several factors on the coordinating abilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
2
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lesser stability of the bisphosphine 1⋅PMe 3 complex is counterintuitive, as it is the most coordinating of the ligands considered. The coordinating ability index for those ligands [34, 35] are 2.9, 1.3, and −0.3 for PMe 3 , thf, and pyridine, respectively (or, equivalently, coordination probabilities of 99.9, 95, and 32 %), and the relative stability would be expected to be the reverse of the trends found for the calculated Gibbs formation energies. Such a counterintuitive effect can be explained by carefully comparing the optimized structures of [Mo 2 (H) 2 (μ‐Ad Dipp2 ) 2 ] and [Mo 2 (H) 2 (μ‐Ad Dipp2 ) 2 (L) 2 ] (L=py, thf, PMe 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The lesser stability of the bisphosphine 1⋅PMe 3 complex is counterintuitive, as it is the most coordinating of the ligands considered. The coordinating ability index for those ligands [34, 35] are 2.9, 1.3, and −0.3 for PMe 3 , thf, and pyridine, respectively (or, equivalently, coordination probabilities of 99.9, 95, and 32 %), and the relative stability would be expected to be the reverse of the trends found for the calculated Gibbs formation energies. Such a counterintuitive effect can be explained by carefully comparing the optimized structures of [Mo 2 (H) 2 (μ‐Ad Dipp2 ) 2 ] and [Mo 2 (H) 2 (μ‐Ad Dipp2 ) 2 (L) 2 ] (L=py, thf, PMe 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However,w ec ould observe as olvent-dependent difference in the speed of the back-conversion. In acetonitrile the back-conversion wass ignificantly slower,w hich is probably ar esult of the stronger competing coordination of acetonitrile compared with chloroform to the cobalt catalyst, [26] as wella sa ni nfluence of the solvent on the isomerization itself. The latter trend was also observed for several substituted derivatives of NBD by Moth-Poulsen and co-workers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our motivations to move away from dichloromethane, toward less hazardous solvents as well as bulk polymerizations,first led us to consider different counteranions of the pyrylium salts to augment solubility.T oq uickly screen the influence of counteranions,w ef irst added several phasetransfer catalysts (PTCs), [33][34][35] as shown in Table S1 ), each yielded PNB in high conversion. Conversely,a ddition of PTCs with more strongly coordinating anions like chloride, bromide,and nitrate,which are usually more nucleophilic, [36] failed to yield any detectable amount of PNB.N ucleophilic attack by anions on the pyrylium cation or radical cationic intermediates likely precluded polymerization in these latter cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%