2016
DOI: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperation of Secondary Transporters and Sensor Kinases in Transmembrane Signalling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding, there are remarkable differences between the Mae1 group and other previously characterized TCS, most notably, the presence of a degenerated CA domain in the MaeK-like sensor proteins, which precludes MaeK ATP-dependent autophosphorylation. Furthermore, in characterized sensor kinases of this family, a cognate transporter usually functions as a co-sensor 23 , but apparently this is not the case for MaeK since the absence of L-malate transporters did not affect the induction of mae genes 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notwithstanding, there are remarkable differences between the Mae1 group and other previously characterized TCS, most notably, the presence of a degenerated CA domain in the MaeK-like sensor proteins, which precludes MaeK ATP-dependent autophosphorylation. Furthermore, in characterized sensor kinases of this family, a cognate transporter usually functions as a co-sensor 23 , but apparently this is not the case for MaeK since the absence of L-malate transporters did not affect the induction of mae genes 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result, together with the absence of genes encoding putative solute binding proteins, suggests that no co-sensor proteins are participating in the regulation of MaeK activity, in contrast to other TCS of the citrate family (e.g. DcuS) 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Among those, E. coli and B. subtilis C4 transporters are some of the best-characterized for auxiliary functions in signal transduction. In particular, the C4-dicarboxylate/orotate symporter DctA, which is a polarly localized non-ABC C4-carbohydrate transporter in E. coli (Scheu et al, 2014;Unden et al, 2016) and similarly in B. subtilis (Groeneveld et al, 2010;Graf et al, 2014), can form a sensory unit with a transmembrane sensor kinase. In E. coli this is the protein DcuS of the DcuS/DcuR TCS (Monzel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Regulatory Influence Of Membrane Transport Proteins and Intrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nutrients, toxins) across the membrane (Tetsch and Jung, ; Piepenbreier et al ., ). As such, transporters can affect HK activity indirectly by altering the concentration of the signaling substrate and/or directly through a protein‐protein interaction with the HK that affects the phosphotransfer process (Witan et al ., ; Dintner et al ., ; Unden et al ., ). Proteins lacking enzymatic activity can also affect the phosphotransfer process through interactions with either the HK or RR (Mitrophanov and Groisman, ; Buelow and Raivio, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is much to learn regarding the physiological function and regulatory mechanisms of accessory regulators, well‐characterized examples point to regulatory complexity not easily attainable with a HK alone. This includes mechanisms for (i) the combinatorial integration of distinct signaling inputs (Cangelosi et al ., ; Unden et al ., ), (ii) establishing regulatory connections between seemingly independent regulatory pathways (Kato and Groisman, ; Eguchi et al ., ; Gerken et al ., ), (iii) altering the sensitivity of the HK for its cognate inducers (Cangelosi et al ., ), (iv) directly sensing nutrient scavenging or detoxification functions (e.g. flux sensing (Fritz et al ., ; Piepenbreier et al ., )) and (v) fine‐tuning response dynamics of the TCS (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%