2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperation and compliance in non-equity alliances

Abstract: This study clarifies cooperation and compliance in non-equity alliances. Partial least squares structural equation modeling findings show how social interaction and risk-based reasoning are both facets of interorganizational decision making. In line with the notion that behaviors follow intentions, partnersÕ risk-taking tendencies (i.e., intentions to cooperate) and compliance tendencies both explain the effort that partners devote to an alliance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, combining the quality of DCE data with the analysis features of PLS-SEM represents a useful approach to assess discrete choices and specifically, when the underlying decision making-irrespective of whether rational, optimizing or pragmatic, heuristic-requires understanding of relative attribute impacts rather than attribute level effects. Moreover, although not explored in this article, DCM, which that employs PLS-SEM to DCE data, provides a basis when, for example, incorporating latent class analyses methods to reveal differences in decision-making as it applies to managers themselves (Lin et al 2016) and a variety of their stakeholders such as alliance partners (e.g., Gudergan et al 2016) or customers (e.g., Mathies et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, combining the quality of DCE data with the analysis features of PLS-SEM represents a useful approach to assess discrete choices and specifically, when the underlying decision making-irrespective of whether rational, optimizing or pragmatic, heuristic-requires understanding of relative attribute impacts rather than attribute level effects. Moreover, although not explored in this article, DCM, which that employs PLS-SEM to DCE data, provides a basis when, for example, incorporating latent class analyses methods to reveal differences in decision-making as it applies to managers themselves (Lin et al 2016) and a variety of their stakeholders such as alliance partners (e.g., Gudergan et al 2016) or customers (e.g., Mathies et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving a common goal is the basis of cooperation [18]. Business managers should build credibility [11] and accountability and enhance compliance in individual interactions with their stakeholders in their environment and outside of that environment [9,19,20]. Individual learning skills in cooperation action are important for full cooperation for some payoff [21,22].…”
Section: Theoretical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crucial issues to be considered in the planning and governing of an alliance include (1) equity distribution, (2) term of agreement, and (3) relationship management [45]. The partners' insights into risk, namely, uncertainty about the external environment's changes, trust, and level of profit-sharing, reflect the factors that lead to the alliance's efforts [77]. Each method for forming an R&D alliance can be explained as a firm's arrangements to minimize all efforts necessary to develop successful products.…”
Section: Types Of Randd Alliancesmentioning
confidence: 99%