1975
DOI: 10.1038/258728a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperation across the histocompatibility barrier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results lead us to several conclusions . First of all they confirm our previous findings (4,5,11,17) Our results are consistent with several previous reports on the properties of T cells raised in chimeric mice in which the authors concluded that I-region restrictions on T-cell/B-cell interactions were not inherent in the genotype of the helper T cell (27,28) . The present study confirms this conclusion and extends it to cover an Ir gene controlled response .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results lead us to several conclusions . First of all they confirm our previous findings (4,5,11,17) Our results are consistent with several previous reports on the properties of T cells raised in chimeric mice in which the authors concluded that I-region restrictions on T-cell/B-cell interactions were not inherent in the genotype of the helper T cell (27,28) . The present study confirms this conclusion and extends it to cover an Ir gene controlled response .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast to the preceding results, helper T cells from A/J ~ CAF1 chimeras showed clear disparities in their ability to provide helper activity for certain of the B-cell types. Thus, while effective help was provided to conventional CAF1 and A/J and to chimeric CAF1 ~ CAF1, A/J CAFa and CAF1 ~ A/J B cells, little or no demonstrable helper activity was provided for B cells derived from either conventional BALB/c (group 19) or BALB/c ~ CAF1 (group 22) chimera donors. These results indicate quite clearly that T cells in the A/ J ~ CAF1 chimera retain the phenotype of the original parental strain in terms of genetic restriction in their cooperative activity (2,3).…”
Section: Caf1 Helper T Cells (Fig 2) Conventional Cafa Helper T Celmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of the original interpretation of the basis for genetic restrictions dictating the most effective interactions between T and B lymphocytes in the development of antibody responses came under question amidst the reports of other investigators who failed to find similar restrictions in different systems in which T-B-cell cooperative responses were analyzed (17)(18)(19); more recent studies in these very same laboratories have clarified these matters somewhat (20)(21)(22). The most compelling of such experiments were those performed with cells obtained from tetraparental bone marrow chimeric mice (17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the suppressive effects of allogeneic T cells have been appreciated for some time, simple in vitro systems allowing the systematic study of negative aliogeneic effects have only recently been exploited (Epstein & Cohn, 1977, Swain & Dutton, 1977a, Swain et al, 1976, Waldmann et al, 1976. These systems indicate that potent suppression results even when unprimed T eels confront responding B cells which differ at the MHC.…”
Section: A Llosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%