2007
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00987-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooccurring Gentiana verna and Gentiana acaulis and Their Neighboring Plants in Two Swiss Upper Montane Meadows Harbor Distinct Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities

Abstract: The community composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was analyzed in roots of Gentiana verna, Gentiana acaulis, and accompanying plant species from two species-rich Swiss alpine meadows located in the same area. The aim of the study was to elucidate the impact of host preference or host specificity on the AMF community in the roots. The roots were analyzed by nested PCR, restriction fragment length polymorphism screening, and sequencing of ribosomal DNA small-subunit and internal transcribed spacer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oehl et al (9), in an extensive study, found that soil type is a key factor determining the composition of the AMF community. Recent AMF diversity studies have revealed that the AMF community composition is host plant dependent (16,17,21,22,(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64). Interestingly, when we focused on the plant and AMF communities inhabiting gypsum soils, we also found differences between the AMF harbored in gypsophyte and gypsovag plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Oehl et al (9), in an extensive study, found that soil type is a key factor determining the composition of the AMF community. Recent AMF diversity studies have revealed that the AMF community composition is host plant dependent (16,17,21,22,(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64). Interestingly, when we focused on the plant and AMF communities inhabiting gypsum soils, we also found differences between the AMF harbored in gypsophyte and gypsovag plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Zangaro et al (2008Zangaro et al ( , 2013 showed that root colonization and spore density decreased among successional stages from grasslands to mature forests and different stages in plant age and succession also influence the AMF communities (Husband et al 2002;Aldrich-Wolfe 2007). Other studies indicate host preferences (Scheublin et al 2004;Sýkorová et al 2007;Torrecillas et al 2012;Yang et al 2012). In general, standardized analyses, possibly based on the methods presented here, may allow a more robust interpretation and comparison of such data in the future.…”
Section: Influence Of Plant Stage and Altitude On Amf Species Communimentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this sense, we considered the AMF communities as the sum of both soil and root populations, to establish their relationships with the edaphic characteristics tested. There is evidence of several biotic factors with strong influences in regulating AMF community composition, with the best studied being the host plant (29,30,(72)(73)(74) and host functional traits (6,37). Among the abiotic factors that can have relevant roles in driving AMF communities are soil moisture (75), rainfall patterns, and geographical distance (40,76).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%