2021
DOI: 10.1049/ipr2.12046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional neural network for smoke and fire semantic segmentation

Abstract: In recent decades, global warming has contributed to an increase in the number and intensity of wildfires destroying millions hectares of forest areas and causing many casualties each year. Firemen must therefore have the most effective means to prevent any wildfire from breaking out and to fight the blaze before being unable to contain and extinguish it. This article will present a new network architecture based on Convolutional Neural Network to detect and locate smoke and fire. This network generates fire a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method showed good results (accuracy of 93.4% and segmentation time per image of 21.1 s) using data augmentation techniques such as rotation, flip, changing brightness/contrast, crop, and adding noises. It outperformed previous published models and proved its efficiency in detecting and classifying fire/smoke pixels [61].…”
Section: Fire Segmentation Using Deep Learning Approaches For Uavmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method showed good results (accuracy of 93.4% and segmentation time per image of 21.1 s) using data augmentation techniques such as rotation, flip, changing brightness/contrast, crop, and adding noises. It outperformed previous published models and proved its efficiency in detecting and classifying fire/smoke pixels [61].…”
Section: Fire Segmentation Using Deep Learning Approaches For Uavmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Using a dropout strategy and the FLAME dataset, U-Net obtained an F1-score of 87.75% and proved its ability to segment wildfire and identify the precise shapes of flames [28]. Frizzi et al [61] also proposed a method based on VGG16 to segment both smoke and fire. This method showed good results (accuracy of 93.4% and segmentation time per image of 21.1 s) using data augmentation techniques such as rotation, flip, changing brightness/contrast, crop, and adding noises.…”
Section: Fire Segmentation Using Deep Learning Approaches For Uavmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the weighted method, comparative experiments with and without the weight were conducted on several common semantic segmentation networks, such as FCN [56], Segnet [57] and Unet [58], and a forest fire smoke detection method, Frizzi [39]. The control coefficient and weighted loss function type for all the tested network architectures have been determined by alike experiments conducted in 3.4, as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic segmentation based on CNN, with the input of an arbitrary-size image, utilizes a set of convolutional layers, non-linear activation functions, pooling and upsampling layers to output a predicted image [34][35][36][37][38]. Moreover, CNNs have achieved a lot of significant results in the field of vision detection of forest fire smoke [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the spatial features, Kim et al [29] applied Faster R-CNN to detect suspected fire regions, which LSTM then used to interpret the dynamic fire behavior. Apart from detection, some CNNs also allowed for segmenting the fire in an image [30], [31]. One limitation of CNN-based approaches is that they suffer if fire regions are small, which is an inherent limitation of conventional CNNs due to their fixed-size receptive fields [32].…”
Section: A Fire Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%