Convicts, Commodities, and Connections in British Asia and the Indian Ocean, 1789–1866

Abstract

This article explores the transportation of Indian convicts to the port cities of the Bay of Bengal and the Indian Ocean during the period 1789 to 1866. It considers the relationship between East India Company transportation and earlier and concurrent British Crown transportation to the Americas and Australia. It is concerned in particular with the interconnection between convictism and enslavement in the Atlantic and Indian Ocean worlds. Examining the roots of transportation in South Asia in the repressive policies of the East India Company, especially in relation to its occupation of land and expropriation of resources, it moves on to discuss aspects of convicts’ lives in Moulmein, Singapore, Mauritius, and Aden. This includes their labour regime and their relationship to other workers. It argues that Indian convict transportation was part of a carceral circuit of repression and coerced labour extraction that was intertwined with the expansion of East India Company governance and trade. The Company used transportation as a means of removing resistant subjects from their homes, and of supplying an unfree labour force to develop commodity exports and to build the infrastructure necessary for the establishment, population, and connection of littoral nodes. However, the close confinement and association of convicts during transportation rendered the punishment a vector for the development of transregional political solidarities, centred in and around the Company's port cities.

The Gaols of Guyana: Hauntology and Trauma in the soundscape of Prison

“…Thus, they were an intrinsic and necessary component of capitalist accumulation processes (Franklin, 1979;Middlebrook, 2016). The relationship between forced labour and the back-breaking work integral to production, profit and capitalism was largely silenced, but instead justified on the grounds of reformation and teaching selfdiscipline through a regimented life (Smith 2014;Anderson 2019). This was reinforced by punishment, which also created its own aurality; sounds of punishment, pain, and suffering.…”