2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01776-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion surgery only for highly selected patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a satisfactory outcome in exchange for a lower resection rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of five articles that identified predictors of resectability showed that decreased CA19‐9 level was a predictor . Eight of 11 articles identifying predictors of OS also showed decreased CA19‐9 level as a prognostic factor for OS . All three articles reporting prognostic factors for DFS showed that CA19‐9 response was a prognostic factor .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four of five articles that identified predictors of resectability showed that decreased CA19‐9 level was a predictor . Eight of 11 articles identifying predictors of OS also showed decreased CA19‐9 level as a prognostic factor for OS . All three articles reporting prognostic factors for DFS showed that CA19‐9 response was a prognostic factor .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the present review, the surgical indication for conversion surgery remains unclear, and it differed in each institution. One institution had strict criteria, as follows: tumor shrinkage to R/BR status, decreased levels of tumor marker, maintenance of performance status, and a long interval between initial treatment and surgical resection . Strict criteria may lead to lower resectability but longer OS as a result of patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversion surgery represents a new therapeutic strategy which may improve short- and long-term outcomes of patients with UR-PDAC. Several articles have reported the utility of CS in such patients, as well as the positive effects on prognosis [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. In the present study, the rate of CS among patients with UR-LA and UR-M was similar to that reported previously [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several articles have reported the utility of CS in such patients, as well as the positive effects on prognosis [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. In the present study, the rate of CS among patients with UR-LA and UR-M was similar to that reported previously [ 25 ]. We found the long-term prognosis; one-, three-, and five-year OS rates from initial treatment; and MST were significantly better among patients with long PR/SD who did not undergo CS, although there were no significant differences in survival with relation to UR-LA or UR-M.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median resection rate was 28.6% (range, 8%-69%), the negative margin resection rate was 78.3% (range, 35%-100%), and the MST was 12-96 months for LA-PDAC. 26,29,37,[174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193] The median resection rate was 14.3% (range, 2%-43%), the margin-negative resection rate was 88% (range, 51%-91.3%), and the MST was 21.9-56 months, even in advanced PDAC with distant metastases. 34,[194][195][196][197][198] Accordingly, even in UR-LA and UR-M PDACs, good prognosis was feasible when resection was performed, and MST was equivalent to that of R-PDAC.…”
Section: Conversion Surgery For Initially Unresectable Pdacmentioning
confidence: 98%