2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of Norway spruce forests will reduce organic carbon pools in the mountain soils of SW Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the Ol and Of + Oh layers was measured in the field (±0.1 cm). We sampled the top 10 cm of mineral soil because tree species have the greatest impact on the uppermost layers of the mineral soil (Augusto et al 2002;Hagen-Thorn et al 2004), and the top 10 cm of mineral soil roughly represents the 35-40 % of the total SOC stock down to 100 cm soil depth in Norway spruce and European beech forests (Galka et al 2014). Moreover, recent studies show that signif icant differences in C sequestration between conifers and de ciduous species over the last decades in French forests have only occurred at the uppermost 20 cm (Jonard et al 2013).…”
Section: Forest Soil Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the Ol and Of + Oh layers was measured in the field (±0.1 cm). We sampled the top 10 cm of mineral soil because tree species have the greatest impact on the uppermost layers of the mineral soil (Augusto et al 2002;Hagen-Thorn et al 2004), and the top 10 cm of mineral soil roughly represents the 35-40 % of the total SOC stock down to 100 cm soil depth in Norway spruce and European beech forests (Galka et al 2014). Moreover, recent studies show that signif icant differences in C sequestration between conifers and de ciduous species over the last decades in French forests have only occurred at the uppermost 20 cm (Jonard et al 2013).…”
Section: Forest Soil Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studied soils under dwarf pine shrub, the SOC stock in the O horizon comprised only one-third of the entire SOC stock despite its substantial thickness, which is similar to the results obtained in forest soils in the Stołowe Mts. in southwestern Poland (Gałka et al, 2014).…”
Section: 2 Land Use Effects On Soil Morphology and Soc Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-listed fi ndings lead to the conclusion that all archival data of soil pH at soil:solution ratio 1:2.5 can be reliably recalculated using simple linear regression equations to the desired pH values at soil:solution ratio 1:5. Additionally, the differences between pH values at soil:solution ratios 1:2.5 and 1:5, both in distilled water and KCl solution are under this study much smaller or even insignifi cant as compared to the reported pH differences related to fi eld variability [18,29,36,50,51]. Thus, the pH values at soil:solution ratios 1:2.5 and 1:5 may be considered identical (do not require the recalculation), if 1) the natural soil variability is high, or 2) only the pH class is required (as for fertility evaluation), or 3) soil pH is the only accompanying variable (as in monitoring of soil contamination with heavy metals).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…[17][18][19][20]. Changes in soil pH are considered a sensitive indicator of human impacts (from agriculture, industry, urbanization, and others), both as acidifi cation [21][22][23] and alkalization [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Soil pH is therefore involved in all soil-oriented studies, inventories, and databases [31][32][33][34], as well as in most environmental monitoring programs [35][36][37][38][39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%