2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-015-0536-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree species identity mediates mechanisms of top soil carbon sequestration in a Norway spruce and European beech mixed forest

Abstract: Abstract& Key message Combined effects of litterfall and root turnover significantly increase topsoil carbon stocks in Norway spruce and European beech mixed forests, indicating local complementarity effects mediated by tree species mixtures. & Context The establishment of mixed stands by intermingling individuals of European beech and Norway spruce is an ongoing trend in adaptive forest management strategies. However, our understanding of the potential of these strategies to promote C sequestration remains li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds with the studies by Vesterdal et al (2008Vesterdal et al ( , 2013, who reported that tree species which have a low SOC content in the organic soil horizon have a higher content of SOC in the surface mineral soil horizon. A higher SOC content in the surface mineral horizon was also observed by previous studies carried out in Norway spruce stands (Gurmesa et al 2013, James et al 2014, Andivia et al 2016. Contrastingly, a higher SOC content in the organic (O) horizon was reported by several authors (Frouz et al 2009, Harper & Tibbett 2013, Wiesmeier et al 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corresponds with the studies by Vesterdal et al (2008Vesterdal et al ( , 2013, who reported that tree species which have a low SOC content in the organic soil horizon have a higher content of SOC in the surface mineral soil horizon. A higher SOC content in the surface mineral horizon was also observed by previous studies carried out in Norway spruce stands (Gurmesa et al 2013, James et al 2014, Andivia et al 2016. Contrastingly, a higher SOC content in the organic (O) horizon was reported by several authors (Frouz et al 2009, Harper & Tibbett 2013, Wiesmeier et al 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In this work, we studied the potential for carbon sequestration in the soil of 42 representative stands with dominant Norway spruce in the Czech Republic by analyzing their SOC content, with the aim of estimating its amount in the organic and surface mineral soil horizons and assessing the driving factors affecting SOC content. A number of authors (Vesterdal et al 2013, Pretzsch et al 2014, Vilén et al 2015, Andivia et al 2016, Tashi et al 2016 agree that the potential for carbon sequestration in the soil is influenced by site conditions (altitude, soil type, soil depth, humus form, etc.) and stands characteristics (age, density of stocking and species composition).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning carbon storage, below-ground carbon stocks have been shown to be influenced by species composition [63,64]. A previous study demonstrated a complementary effect occurring on soil organic carbon stocks in Norway spruce-European beech mixtures [64]. Norway spruce litter increased the stock in the forest floor (low degradation rates) whereas the root turnover of European beech increased soil organic carbon stock in the upper mineral soil layer.…”
Section: Mixing Effects In Norway Spruce-european Beech Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it should not veil the interactions at the species level and the benefits in terms of biodiversity, resistance and resilience that reduce financial risks [4]. Concerning carbon storage, below-ground carbon stocks have been shown to be influenced by species composition [63,64]. A previous study demonstrated a complementary effect occurring on soil organic carbon stocks in Norway spruce-European beech mixtures [64].…”
Section: Mixing Effects In Norway Spruce-european Beech Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that approximately 30 to 50% of total carbon content in forests is located in soils (Dixon et al 1994;Paul et al 2002;Pan et al 2011;Wiesmeier et al 2013;Grüneberg et al 2014). The amount of accumulated carbon and its distribution in the soil profile is influenced by individual tree species (Augusto et al 2015;Andivia et al 2016). Carbon accumulation is also significantly affected by the type of economic land use (Blanco-Canqui et al 2014;Wiesmeier et al 2015;Fujisaki et al 2015); in some cases, cultivation of forest soils can even reduce SOC (Murty et al 2002 Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%