Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: a review

Abstract

The global energy demand is projected to rise by almost 28% by 2040 compared to current levels. Biomass is a promising energy source for producing either solid or liquid fuels. Biofuels are alternatives to fossil fuels to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Nonetheless, policy decisions for biofuels should be based on evidence that biofuels are produced in a sustainable manner. To this end, life cycle assessment (LCA) provides information on environmental impacts associated with biofuel production chains. Here, we review advances in biomass conversion to biofuels and their environmental impact by life cycle assessment. Processes are gasification, combustion, pyrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis routes and fermentation. Thermochemical processes are classified into low temperature, below 300 °C, and high temperature, higher than 300 °C, i.e. gasification, combustion and pyrolysis. Pyrolysis is promising because it operates at a relatively lower temperature of up to 500 °C, compared to gasification, which operates at 800–1300 °C. We focus on 1) the drawbacks and advantages of the thermochemical and biochemical conversion routes of biomass into various fuels and the possibility of integrating these routes for better process efficiency; 2) methodological approaches and key findings from 40 LCA studies on biomass to biofuel conversion pathways published from 2019 to 2021; and 3) bibliometric trends and knowledge gaps in biomass conversion into biofuels using thermochemical and biochemical routes. The integration of hydrothermal and biochemical routes is promising for the circular economy.

Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review

“…The midpoint categories are aggregated to present results as endpoint categories such as human health, damage to ecosystem quality in the form of loss of species and resources depletion (Osman et al 2021b). It is argued that the environmental impacts should be presented as midpoint categories to prevent oversimplification or misinterpretation of environmental impacts (Kalbar et al 2017).…”

Environmental Impact Assessment of Heat Generation from Residues: a Forest-Based Industry Case Study

“…The study focuses on a sawmill located in Santiago Papasquiaro at the State of Durango, Mexico, which is the main timber forest national producer supplying 35.1% of wood, where 1591,141 round m 3 are destined for sawing, 394,737 round m 3 for pulp, 286,042 round m 3 for sheet and plywood, 13,763 round m 3 for posts, and finally 71,239 round m 3 for fuels with a total of 2,356,922 round m 3 with a monetary value of US$ 130,473,626 [7]. The unit round m 3 is used in sawmills and represents the volume of roundwood or sawn wood (logs from debarked trees) in m 3 . The mass varies according to the species.…”

“…In fact, waste to energy projects is a form of energy recovery. It has been reported that waste-derived feedstocks could provide more sustainable energy sources by mitigating impacts on land use and water depletion incurred during the production of energy crops [3]. However, questions about the ecological consequences of the intensive use of biomass and the environmental impacts associated are important and are currently being discussed [1,4].…”

Development of soapstock processing technology to ensure waste-free and safe production

“…The production of vegetable oil from sunflower seeds involves a number of by-products, namely: husk, cake, meal, phosphatide concentrate, soapstock, bleaching clays and others [4]. The main cause of environmental pollution is the openness of the resource cycle, which leads to the accumulation of waste [5]. Efficient processing of production waste is the key to production greening, provided by the introduction of the latest scientific research, energy-efficient resource-saving technologies, low-waste, waste-free technological processes.…”