2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional methods and future trends in antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CaF 2 nanoparticles are water‐insoluble, and their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) is determined by the turbidimetric assay method as shown in Figure 4 20,25 . The test is carried out against two‐gram negative bacteria E .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…CaF 2 nanoparticles are water‐insoluble, and their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) is determined by the turbidimetric assay method as shown in Figure 4 20,25 . The test is carried out against two‐gram negative bacteria E .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated colonies were measured after these LB agar plates had been incubated at 37 C overnight. 20…”
Section: Methods Of Determining Minimum Inhibitory Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The broth microdilution method is a fast and accurate assay that utilizes small volumes of test antimicrobial and allows for rapid testing of bacteria. Nonetheless, the process of manually handling solutions of antimicrobial agents during the preparation stage may increase the possibility of errors (Salam et al., 2023). Agar dilution methods offer several advantages when compared to diffusion techniques, including the ability to test multiple biological isolates simultaneously, the capacity to observe heterogeneous populations or mixed cultures, and the flexibility to select a range of sample concentrations for testing (Salam et al., 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%