Controvérsias sobre a revisão ética de pesquisas em ciências humanas e sociais pelo Sistema CEP/Conep

Barbosa, Adriana Silva; Corrales, Carlos Montero; Silbermann, Marcos

doi:10.1590/1983-80422014223031

Cited by 15 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Discutiremos brevemente esse protocolo, a fim de refletir sobre seu sentido, mas também sobre os entraves que ele impõe para o início das pesquisas acadêmicas. Diversos autores têm questionado o excesso de burocratização do protocolo a ser cumprido e submetido à Plataforma Brasil (Harayama 2014;Duarte 2015Duarte , 2017Barbosa et al 2014). Esse excesso de burocratização atingiu de modo desproporcional pesquisadores no campo das Ciências Humanas e Sociais, sobretudo pela organização do sistema de regulamentação ética em torno do biocentrismo e pela falta de reconhecimento das especificidades metodológicas e éticas dessas áreas (Duarte 2014).…”

Section: Cuidados Anterioresunclassified

Cuidados éticos na pesquisa social: entre normas e reflexões críticas

Silva

Lionço

2018

Amazônica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo tem como objetivo refletir sobre o sentido da regulamentação ética da pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos nas Ciências Humanas e Sociais. Pretendemos, como integrantes de um comitê de ética voltado para a apreciação de pesquisas nessas áreas, contribuir para a defesa dessa regulamentação por meio de uma reflexão crítica, na qual a ética não é entendida como sinônimo de conhecimento técnico. A missão prioritária dos comitês de ética em pesquisa deve ser proteger os sujeitos participantes das pesquisas científicas, sendo esse um dispositivo fundamental para o controle social da ciência. Para além do protocolo de revisão ética formalmente exigido, concorrem para a noção de ética deliberações plurais, das quais a própria sociedade deve participar. Mais particularmente, em relação às nossas aproximações a sujeitos participantes de pesquisas, devemos levar em consideração uma ética de responsabilidade que implique a reflexão sobre os desdobramentos de nossa presença e de nossas ações por meio de pesquisas nas vidas e instituições diante das quais nos propusemos incidir

show abstract

Section: Cuidados Anterioresunclassified

Cuidados éticos na pesquisa social: entre normas e reflexões críticas

Silva

Lionço

2018

Amazônica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the advent of Plataforma Brasil sought to increase the solvability of the CEP-CONEP system, this tool has been criticised because its format still focuses on biomedical research, which creates difficulties for HSS scholars. The specificity of the platform is reproduced in the CEPs, where sensitivity and knowledge are essential to suggest and accept adjustments in relation to the completion of the form items, in order to contemplate the assessment of the non-biomedical projects of the larger areas of knowledge of Group III of the CONEP (11) .…”

Section: Problems Encountered By Researchers During the Approval Of Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another aspect that is criticised is the strict application of the compulsory consent statement when it is impractical, as in the case of research involving criminals or studies on practices that are illegal in Brazil, such as abortion (11) . The HSS have specific ethical dimensions that almost exclusively depend on the insertion of the researcher in the community and the relationships he or she establishes with research participants (12)(13) .…”

Section: Problems Encountered By Researchers During the Approval Of Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Contrarily, Resolution 466/2012 maintained the organisational structure of the CEP-CONEP system and enabled specific advancements, including a possible complementary resolution to meet the specifics of research in the HSS (7,14) , which was one of the major contributions of Resolution 466/2012 to these fields. As predicted, a workgroup was formed in 2013 to create this complementary resolution with the representatives of CONEP and other associations and research societies in several areas of knowledge, such as the ABA (11) .…”

Section: Problems Encountered By Researchers During the Approval Of Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, some points of the draft lack clarity, such as the specification about what the resolution defines as different levels of caution. It is also important to better define and list which criteria will be adopted by the CEPs to check the level of risk by the CEP secretariat; to explain that the researcher, whose project with minimal risk has been chosen for review by the CEP, must be immediately reported using Plataforma Brasil; and to specify how research with be treated in the interface between the HSS and other areas of knowledge (10)(11) .…”

Section: Problems Encountered By Researchers During the Approval Of Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dificuldades e desafios em revisar aspectos éticos das pesquisas no Brasil

Lopes-Júnior

Nascimento

Lima

et al. 2016

Rev. Gaúcha Enferm.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To reflect on the problems faced by researchers from different areas, especially of Humanities and Social Sciences, when submitting research projects for evaluation by the research ethics committees in Brazil. Method A theoretical and reflective study based on international literature and the critical analysis of the authors. Results Although Resolution 466/2012, which addresses human research, contains some innovations, issues related to the research participants remain obscure and the project evaluation process is time-consuming. Conclusion The difficulties faced by researchers, especially in the fields of Humanities and Social Sciences, must be transposed to ensure that the ethical guidelines are applicable, in terms of principles and procedures, to the different research traditions. Appropriate human research standards must be managed by a system with a satisfactory operational capacity, according to the specificities of the different areas of knowledge.

show abstract

Trajectory of an ethics commitee: 10 years of Plataforma Brasil

Castro-Silva,

Nascimento,

Portela

et al. 2023

Rev. Bioét.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study outlines the profile of the Ethics Committee of the Acaraú Valley State University, Ceará, Brazil, after 10 years of Plataforma Brasil. Bibliographic search surveyed research conducted between 2012 and 2021 according to actors and processes, following descriptive analysis. Results showed a prevalence of female researchers from the health or biological sciences field, and reviewers had a greater academic background, length of experience, and number of projects than researchers. Of the 2,295 studies analyzed, most were approved by 2015, completed in 2016 and under evaluation in 2021, with clear decrease in 2020 and 2021. Original research from national self-funded institutional coordinating centers without thematic area, with a favorable ethical opinion within three months, and reduced flow time between quinquennia stood out. Main ethical obstacles concerned the informed consent and risks. This overview highlights the importance of the platform for scientific progress.

show abstract

Controvérsias sobre a revisão ética de pesquisas em ciências humanas e sociais pelo Sistema CEP/Conep

Cited by 15 publications

References 7 publications

Cuidados éticos na pesquisa social: entre normas e reflexões críticas

Cuidados éticos na pesquisa social: entre normas e reflexões críticas

Dificuldades e desafios em revisar aspectos éticos das pesquisas no Brasil

Trajectory of an ethics commitee: 10 years of Plataforma Brasil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About