2008 International Conference on Radar 2008
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2008.4653963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling track coalescence with scaled Joint Probabilistic Data Association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dramatic pruning used for ENNPDA, however, leads to an undesired sensitivity to clutter and missed detections [10]. Kennedy’s paper [11] proposed a new scaled JPDA algorithm which introduced an arbitrary positive scaling factor. When the scale factor value is infinity, the algorithm is equivalent to the ENNPDA algorithm, and when the scale factor value is one, the algorithm is equivalent to the JPDA algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dramatic pruning used for ENNPDA, however, leads to an undesired sensitivity to clutter and missed detections [10]. Kennedy’s paper [11] proposed a new scaled JPDA algorithm which introduced an arbitrary positive scaling factor. When the scale factor value is infinity, the algorithm is equivalent to the ENNPDA algorithm, and when the scale factor value is one, the algorithm is equivalent to the JPDA algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the factor nodes will send messages to variable nodes according to (6) and (7). The messages passed through each edge at 0 = t can be obtained as, …”
Section: A Message Passing Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal was to exclude those hypotheses that lead to track coalescence and the method is extended to include integrated track maintenance in [5]. Avoiding track coalescence with appropriate scaling of hypotheses is discussed in [6]. The method described in this paper provides a graphical model framework to obtain refined likelihood values that match the correct association configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this algorithm will lead to track over commitment and an increased incidence of track divergence in the presence of clutter and absent target detections. The paper [6] proposed a Scaled JPDA algorithm which can avoid track coalescence. And I have presented other three modified algorithms avoiding track coalescence: the modified JPDA algorithm based on exclusive measurement and Entropy Value Method (EEJPDA) [7], K-Nearest Neighbor JPDA algorithm (KNNJPDA) [8] and Scaled EEJPDA algorithm (SEEJPDA) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%