2011
DOI: 10.1057/sj.2011.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling retail theft with CCTV domes, CCTV public view monitors, and protective containers: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…rather than CCTV, was considered the main intervention given that both experimental and control areas were covered by CCTV. Hayes and Downs (2011) randomized the use of CCTV across 47 retail stores, a setting that was outside the scope of this review. 16 shotspotter.com/system/content-uploads/SST_FAQ_January_2018.pdf.…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Policy And Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rather than CCTV, was considered the main intervention given that both experimental and control areas were covered by CCTV. Hayes and Downs (2011) randomized the use of CCTV across 47 retail stores, a setting that was outside the scope of this review. 16 shotspotter.com/system/content-uploads/SST_FAQ_January_2018.pdf.…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Policy And Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small impact upon crime rates is attributable to CCTV implementation; however, it may be argued that this is a poor measure for effectiveness (Gill & Spriggs, 2005). It is conversely clear that CCTV interventions are effective as a deterrence to theft in a retail setting (Hayes & Downs, 2011); however, environmental factors and CCTV line of sight are also salient in crime prevention and behavioural change amongst offenders (Piza, Caplan, & Kennedy, 2014). There are a number of factors addressed by BWV that CCTV does not, such as line of sight, environmental factors and clarity of evidence gathering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Welsh and Farrington (2009) present a review of the empirical literature, which is mainly concentrated on small-scaled experiences and focuses on partial equilibrium effects. 6 In addition, only a few papers address the causality problem between the installation of cameras and crime -exceptions include King et al (2008), Hayes and Downs (2011), La Vigne et al (2011), Priks (2014), van Ours and Vollaard (2016), and Gómez-Cardona et al (2017. 7 Thus, our first contribution to the literature is to study the causal impact of a larger-scaled introduction of police-monitored cameras compared with the previous literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, only a few papers address the causality problem between the installation of cameras and crime – exceptions include King et al . (), Hayes and Downs (), La Vigne et al . (), Priks (), van Ours and Vollaard (), and Gómez‐Cardona et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%