2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.187205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Orbital Moment and Spin Orientation in CoO Layers by Strain

Abstract: We have observed that CoO films grown on different substrates show dramatic differences in their magnetic properties. Using polarization dependent x-ray absorption spectroscopy at the Co L2,3 edges, we revealed that the magnitude and orientation of the magnetic moments strongly depend on the strain in the films induced by the substrate. We presented a quantitative model to explain how strain together with the spin-orbit interaction determine the 3d orbital occupation, the magnetic anisotropy, as well as the sp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
171
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nontrivial relation (15) between the shape of the sample and external stress produced by the substrate may reveal itself in switching of the shape-induced direction of easy axis for different substrates. Really, if K elas 2 > 0, then, equilibrium orientation of L in monodomain sample is parallel to the ellipse's long axis a (X-direction), as can be seen from (4) and inset in fig.…”
Section: Shape Effect In Antiferromagnetic Nanopillarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nontrivial relation (15) between the shape of the sample and external stress produced by the substrate may reveal itself in switching of the shape-induced direction of easy axis for different substrates. Really, if K elas 2 > 0, then, equilibrium orientation of L in monodomain sample is parallel to the ellipse's long axis a (X-direction), as can be seen from (4) and inset in fig.…”
Section: Shape Effect In Antiferromagnetic Nanopillarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative intensity changes at various peaks mainly arise from "magnetic linear dichroism," [26][27][28][29] while the observed peak energy shifts of several tenths of an eV are mainly attributed "crystal field dichroism." [30][31][32] The energy shift of the L 3 main peak is about ∼−0.24 eV, while for the L 3 prepeak, it is ∼+0.13 eV when the x-ray polarization goes from E//a to E//c. Such result indicates that the 3z 2 -r 2 orbital is likely to be lower in energy comparing to the x 2 -y 2 orbital, and the energy of the xz-zy orbital is higher than the xy orbital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fact essentially different in details. First of all, our set includes a low temperature (20 K) spectrum representative for the LS state, and second, our spectra do not show a pronounced shoulder at 777 eV photon energy which is characteristic for the presence of Co 2+ impurities [39]. The extended temperature range and especially the purity of the probed samples provide the required sensitivity for the spin-state related spectral changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%