2008 43rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/upec.2008.4651646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled switching of transformers - effects of closing time scatter and residual flux uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling rate of 162 samples per cycle has been chosen for all cases. [23], Frequency response method [18], voltage accumulator method [19], and voltage integration method [24] have been used to portray the level of demagnetization status of transformer core. These methods discussed only nil-demagnetization case and other possible states of natural de-magnetization are not addressed.…”
Section: Nil De-magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling rate of 162 samples per cycle has been chosen for all cases. [23], Frequency response method [18], voltage accumulator method [19], and voltage integration method [24] have been used to portray the level of demagnetization status of transformer core. These methods discussed only nil-demagnetization case and other possible states of natural de-magnetization are not addressed.…”
Section: Nil De-magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is defined by the conditions imposed on the transformer at the moment that precedes its interruption. The correct estimation of the residual flux is extremely important for the success of the controlled switching strategy [7], as it defines the point on the voltage waveform at which the switches are to be closed next.…”
Section: Residual Flux Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each simulation and for each phase, the controller module finally evaluates the maximum inrush current value (inrush current peak) and the voltage across the circuit-breaker immediately before it is closed (amplitude of the voltage wave front) and stores these values in a matrix. A more detailed description of the controller interface can be found in [14], chapters IV.A, IV.C and IV.D where similar algorithms were used for systematic inrush current studies in the laboratory. Prague, 8-11 June 2009 Paper 0194 CIRED2009 Session 1…”
Section: Controller Interface Between Matlab and Emtp-atpmentioning
confidence: 99%